Covid Vaccination in Children and the Law

"In 2019 the New Brunswick Provincial government introduced Bill C39 which attempted to end non medical vaccination exemptions for school aged children. In June 2020 the bill was defeated by a narrow margin.
What is of paramount importance is that the original drafting of the bill recognized the constitutional issues surrounding such a policy. The bill intended to invoke the notwithstanding clause which would prevent any court or charter challenges.

What have we seen?

First policies were implemented to entice children 12-17 to get vaccinated without parental approval. In Toronto ice cream was offered. This is just one example. Now children 5-11 who participate in clinical trials are being called superheroes. In a November 23rd press conference Ontario Health Minister Christine Elliott referred to them as such. The propaganda and coercion that has infested this issue is unfathomable. Police on Guard believes in the rule of law and that the answer to these issues require a court ruling.
The takeaway. Provincial governments are well aware that mandatory vaccinations infringe on citizens fundamental Charter rights."

https://policeonguard.ca/covid-vacci...T7QliOrElnt2Ug

Yes the PMO was warned of the ramifications of making the vaccinations mandatory...so they went the route of coercion to gain compliance.

And it worked, with some of the weaker minds of the population, but around the democracies of the world, there are thousands of protests every day against this tactic and the rights and freedoms it strips from society. Rights soldiers gave their lives fighting for, cast aside for the 'carrot' of going see a movie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

Yes the PMO was warned of the ramifications of making the vaccinations mandatory...so they went the route of coercion to gain compliance.

And it worked, with some of the meaker minds of the population, but around the demographic world there are thousands of protests every day against this tactic and the rights and freedoms it strips from society. Rights soldiers gave their lives fighting for, cast aside for the 'carrot' of going see a movie.

---

You know Mike what the irony is in all of this.
If you get the vax and passport you are entitled to go sit in front of a big screen somewhere and be further indoctrinated.
Pathetic but true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by impact

You know Mike what the irony is in all of this.
If you get the vax and passport you are entitled to go sit in front of a big screen somewhere and be further indoctrinated.
Pathetic but true.

---

And businesses can open up and survive ... much better than the last lock down we had!
Yeah, there's some very important aspects to all this, much more important than watching a movie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

Yes the PMO was warned of the ramifications of making the vaccinations mandatory...so they went the route of coercion to gain compliance.

And it worked, with some of the meaker minds of the population, but around the demographic world there are thousands of protests every day against this tactic and the rights and freedoms it strips from society. Rights soldiers gave their lives fighting for, cast aside for the 'carrot' of going see a movie.

---

Your right there, soldiers gave their lives and self sacrificed themselves for the betterment of society.
Hard to compare oneself to them when you put your well being before society.
Maybe it was not the carrot that motivated so many to do their duty, but in all fights there are the deserters that protest too much..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers

Your right there, soldiers gave their lives and self sacrificed themselves for the betterment of society.
Hard to compare oneself to them when you put your well being before society.

---

So does that mean that you think forcing jabs on children who rarely get covid and only have minor symptoms is for the betterment of society as a whole? Just wondering.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smitty55

So does that mean that you think forcing jabs on children who rarely get covid and only have minor symptoms is for the betterment of society as a whole? Just wondering.

---

I believe its the parents responsibility to guide the child to the right decision for them and act within the guidelines and mandates associated with that choice.

Putting experimental drugs into innocent children with zero recourse if they get injured or worse should be considered a crime

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers

.
Hard to compare oneself to them when you put your well being before society.

---

The 'well being of our society" has been so eroded by the Government imposed mandated lockdowns, restrictions and the pitting of vaxxed against unvaxxed that the 12% of the population, who have decided to take a stand and fight for their rights, pales in comparison to what has been done.

remember..the unvaccinated are no threat to the fully vaccinated in society...as they are protected by the mRNA vaccine :) :

Do You Have ALL THE INFORMATION

Healthy children are at minimal risk of severe outcomes like hospitalizations from COVID-19

The risk of hospitalization from COVID-19 is less than that of influenza during the last 3 years

Your child is 10 times more likely to die of a motor vehicle accident than COVID-19; and 2-3 times more likely to die from drowning than from COVID-19

Once recovered from COVID-19, children have long lasting, robust immunity against future infection

More than 50% of kids have already had COVID-19 and about 40% of those were asymptomatic

Getting the vaccine after COVID-19 infection increases the risk of side effects, including severe and potentially life-threatening side-effects, from the vaccine

Fully vaccinated children can transmit COVID-19 and infect others as well as unvaccinated children

The mRNA technology in COVID-19 vaccines in Canada has never been used clinically in humans before

The Moderna vaccine uses the same mRNA technology as Pfizer - and has been suspended for use in children and young people in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Germany and France

COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis is only one of many potential adverse effects. It is not a “mild” disease. In many children, it can cause long term disability and some children may die of vaccine-induced myocarditi

Dr. Bonnie Mallard Ph.D. – Professor of Immunology and Immunogenetics,
University of Guelph. Winner of Governor General’s award for Innovations in Immunogenetics in 2017 and the NSERC Synergy Prize in the area of Immunogenetics 2021.
Dr Byram Bridle Ph.D. - Associate Professor of Viral Immunology and Vaccine Specialist, University of Guelph
Dr. Neil Karrow Ph.D. - Professor of Immunogenetics and Immunotoxicity, University of Guelph
Dr. Steve Pelech Ph.D. - Professor, Dept of Medicine, University of British Columbia
President and Chief Scientific Officer Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation
Vice-President and Chair, Scientific and Advisory Committee of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance
Dr. Paul Alexander Ph.D. - Expert in evidence-based medicine; Health Epidemiologist. Has worked for WHO, Health Canada and the USA COVID-19 Taskforce.Please see Dr. Alexander’s urgent article for parents:

https://brownstone.org/articles/dear...hildren-alone/

https://www.covidkidfacts.ca/#COD-kid-fact

The additional challenge of this is the law about 12 and up not requiring parent consent. Younger kids are more susceptible to peer pressure then adults.

It quite ironic how parents can held liable for 12 and up in other areas of life, but when it comes to vaccines and gender brainwashing - government knows best...

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by newbiehunter

The additional challenge of this is the law about 12 and up not requiring parent consent. Younger kids are more susceptible to peer pressure then adults.

It quite ironic how parents can held liable for 12 and up in other areas of life, but when it comes to vaccines and gender brainwashing - government knows best...

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

---

Exactly.

Just in case you need any additional fodder for your nightmares -- Pfizer-BioNTech is currently running clinical trials for those aged six months to just under five years: https://tnc.news/2021/11/25/theresa-...-19-next-year/

Attachment 42764 Attachment 42765

"Trials on vaccinating an embryo"
Coming soon to theaters near you [emoji1787][emoji1787]

Meanwhile, real police will be patrolling vaccination sites to ensure anti-vaxxers do not interfere with families.

https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/toronto-p...p-up-1.5683731

Quote:

---

Toronto police to patrol immunization sites as vaccinations for kids aged 5 to 11 ramp up
Bryann Aguilar
CP24 Web Content Writer
Published Friday, November 26, 2021 8:27PM EST
Last Updated Friday, November 26, 2021 8:27PM EST

TORONTO -- Toronto police say charges could be laid against those who will cause trouble at immunization sites in the city that could hinder families from getting their children their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

In a tweet Friday evening, police said officers will be deployed near clinics and will patrol over the coming days.

"Their safety is of utmost importance and interference, or obstruction will not be tolerated. Charges will be laid if warranted," police tweeted.

Const. David Hopkinson told CP24 Friday that the directive came from interim Police Chief James Ramer in response to some concerns expressed by the community.

The city said its five immunization clinics will be running at full capacity this weekend as vaccinations for children aged five to 11 ramp up.

"It's a directive to the officers to be a bit more vigilant," Hopkinson said. "He's directed officers to pay a little bit more attention to the vaccination sites."

Earlier this week, protesters gathered outside a clinic in Windsor as children got their first dose of the Pfizer pediatric vaccine.

Hopkinson said Toronto police have not received any reports of incidents at vaccination clinics but warned that any disruption will not be permitted.

"This is more a proactive measure by the chief to try and provide safety for families that are visiting vaccination sites and to alleviate some concerns," he said.

"If a parent has decided that they think it's safe for their child to be vaccinated, they have the right to go into those vaccination clinics. They have the right to get the vaccination, and nobody should impede them from doing it. It will not be tolerated."

---

"If a parent has decided that they think it's safe for their child to be vaccinated, they have the right to go into those vaccination clinics. They have the right to get the vaccination, and nobody should impede them from doing it. It will not be tolerated."

There is no indication that anyone's access was impeded .

Sounds more like overreaching police powers to quell the people's right to the freedom of speech.

Once you start shoving pamphlets at people in the entrance to a clinic that falls into the category of "impeding."

https://windsorstar.com/news/local-n...of-eligibility

Quote:

---

Despite protests, 800 children receive COVID-19 vaccine on first day of eligibility
Author of the article:Trevor Wilhelm
Publishing date: Nov 25, 2021 • 2 days ago • 2 minute read • 37 Comments

About 800 children received the COVID-19 vaccine Thursday on their first day of eligibility in Windsor, despite the efforts of protesters to stop them.

“It is disappointing people are still trying to stop children and parents from getting their children vaccinated,” said hospital CEO David Musyj. “We will continue to work with Windsor Police Service to stop this inappropriate behaviour by picketers from happening.”

He said about 800 children between the ages of five and 11 received vaccines on Thursday. Another 1,000 or so people aged 12 and up also received first, second or third doses.

There are roughly 33,000 eligible children aged 11 or under in Windsor-Essex. The vaccine centre is booked with about 1,000 children a day through Monday.

While the announcement that children can now be vaccinated prompted thousands calls for appointments, it also sparked plans for a protest.

About 30 or 40 protesters were outside the vaccination centre Thursday at any given time. Some carried signs that read “Stop the poison,” “It’s not a vaxx it’s a bioweapon,” “Kids don’t get it … kids don’t spread it. No masks! No jabs!” and “Our kids are not lab rats!!!”

“You would hope that the people picketing recognize those who are coming have already made a decision,” said Musyj. “It’s done. They’re not going to change, so why attempt to engage with them?”

Picketers tried talking with parents and passing them leaflets. After setting up at the entrance of the vaccination centre, some protesters were removed from the property and told to stay on the sidewalk.

“There were some complaints about their contact with parents,” said Musyj. “We will continue to work with Windsor Police Service and Devonshire Mall leadership to ensure everyone attending the vaccination is safe and those not adhering to our requests to not come onto mall/hospital property will be addressed quickly up to and including criminal charges.”

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Once you start shoving pamphlets at people in the entrance to a clinic that falls into the category of "impeding."

https://windsorstar.com/news/local-n...of-eligibility

---

Is this your real police that you endorse?

"A difficult, but important video to watch. For almost a year, we have devoted our time and resources to speaking out against unconstitutional mandates and doing everything we can to stop this abuse of power. Every POG member, active and retired, refuse to enforce these measures. We swore an Oath and we will always Stand on Guard!"

https://policeonguard.ca/policing-in...wm1YH6a-NuCMQw

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by impact

Is this your real police that you endorse?

"A difficult, but important video to watch. For almost a year, we have devoted our time and resources to speaking out against unconstitutional mandates and doing everything we can to stop this abuse of power. Every POG member, active and retired, refuse to enforce these measures. We swore an Oath and we will always Stand on Guard!"

https://policeonguard.ca/policing-in...wm1YH6a-NuCMQw

---

Cops, active or retired, don't get to decide which laws are constitutional. That is the role of the courts. Until which time current laws are ruled contrary to the constitution then their oath requires the enforce them.

Any cop who disagrees can hand in his papers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Cops, active or retired, don't get to decide which laws are constitutional. That is the role of the courts. Until which time current laws are ruled contrary to the constitution then their oath requires the enforce them.

Any cop who disagrees can hand in his papers.

---

Wrong!....and thanks for showing the group which side of the fence you are on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Cops, active or retired, don't get to decide which laws are constitutional. That is the role of the courts. Until which time current laws are ruled contrary to the constitution then their oath requires the enforce them.

Any cop who disagrees can hand in his papers.

---

So if you disagree with the lies and B's they should be fired?

What's the reason to vaccinate this age group ?

Maybe we should fire some more people for choosing not to take this experimental jab.



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Cops, active or retired, don't get to decide which laws are constitutional. That is the role of the courts. Until which time current laws are ruled contrary to the constitution then their oath requires the enforce them.

Any cop who disagrees can hand in his papers.

---

Seems like the police in Austria has switched stances https://youtu.be/0aZb_BtnP1Y

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by impact

Wrong!....and thanks for showing the group which side of the fence you are on.

---

Yes, I'm on the side opposed to a police state which is what you get when police pick and chose the laws they enforce. If they or anyone else has issue with the laws as passed by duly-elected democratic governments they can pursue remedy in the courts. Otherwise the laws remain in place and the police swore an oath to uphold them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Yes, I'm on the side opposed to a police state which is what you get when police pick and chose the laws they enforce. If they or anyone else has issue with the laws as passed by duly-elected democratic governments they can pursue remedy in the courts. Otherwise the laws remain in place and the police swore an oath to uphold them.

---

That's right. The law abiding police serve and protect We The People.
The ones' you favor are called goon squads.
The crime ? Not wearing a mask.

https://policeonguard.ca/policing-in...YYa8Do-Gj72nxw

The police I endorse most are the ones who ensure children and their parents are not impeded or harassed by anti-vaxx creeps when they go to health clinics.