I have seen a few things in my news feeds about the proposed value of an AR 15 type rifle being bought by the Gov't.
I can't seem to locate an entire list however.
Does anyone have further information?
Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
Printable View
I have seen a few things in my news feeds about the proposed value of an AR 15 type rifle being bought by the Gov't.
I can't seem to locate an entire list however.
Does anyone have further information?
Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
This may be what you're looking for, no prices though:
https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2...ors96-eng.html
The AR15 buy back price seemed to have been released. The fact that it uses a well known gaming term 1337 ( LEET)....is either a huge coincidence, or the gamers / hackers are having a bit of fun.
Either way, for some, it seems that the figure is fairly low.
.99cents per pound... lol
Here's the proposed compensation amount for the 11 categories of prohibited firearms:
AR Platform firearms such as the M16, AR-10 and AR-15 rifles, and the M4 carbine: $1,337
Beretta Cx4 Storm: $1,317
CZ Scorpion EVO 3 carbine and CZ Scorpion EVO 3 pistol: $1,291
M14 Rifle: $2,612
Robinson Armament XCR rifle: $2,735
Ruger Mini-14 rifle: $1,407
SG-550 rifle and SG-551 carbine: $6,209
SIG Sauer MCX, MPX forearms such as the SIG Sauer SIG MPX carbine, and the SIG Sauer SIG MPX pistol: $2,369
Vz58 rifle: $1,139
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/gun-...arms-1.6006129
And the RCMP says the banning and buy back is a waste of money and will do nothing to stop criminals. The money would be better spent to stop criminals. But for Trudeau this is not about Crime it is about banning firearms. Alan Rock once said he wanted to ban all guns and it would be done over time. Death by a thousand cuts.
Hopefully very few turn theirs in.
I'd turn in.
Buy another. Heck if I'm in a shop could leave with 2.
Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
How very true GW. I sure sure silly socks will have a tantrum after he sees very low amounts of legally bought and paid for nonrestricted firearms turned in to the ......... Just for sake of argument aren't firearms all ready banned to the general public unless the person has taken and passed the proper safety tests to own firearms. I'm sure all the thugs running the streets now have there concealed carry don't they?
You can buy a military stock or have one made for almost any firearm out there. But I fail to see how this makes them super powerful. If I put a military plastic on SKS does it become more powerful? What if I get a custom stock to put on my Parker 270 will it become even more powerful?
I have asked this question to some antis and they refuse to answer the question.
Maybe I should get a custom military for my Lee Enfield I can probably shoot through mountains.
My AR is staying in my safe. They can KMA!
The options for the owners of the prohibited firearms that are unregistered are limited. Unless there is a grandfathering provision or they have them rendered inoperable they can't legally keep them. They can't hunt with them or take them to the range and if caught with them risk being criminally charged and, at best, losing ALL of their firearms.
Or they can take the government's money and buy guns they can legally own.
Well as a Aaron Tippin sang it " You gotta stand for something or you will fall for anything " . By all means if you have a family heirloom that was legally bought and taxes paid on it and think you should turn it in because some failed drama teacher teacher says so by all means go for it.
I may be way off base here, but assault weapons, grenades, flame throwers, rocket launchers etc. were already banned in the mid 70s in this country. What is being added to the ban is any gun that "looks" like a scary assault gun made to kill people by the hundreds and thousands. It doesn't even have to be operable as a firearm, it just has to be scary or offend someone. And watch out if your .22 holds 10 high powered rim fire projectiles, those puppies will blow through over 2 inches of corragated cardboard.
As the old song goes.......... Its only just begun............
John
the Government of Canada has outlined its new mandatory buyback program for Canadian firearm owners and is looking for feedback on the pricing scale of the new gun law.
Per a recent release by Public Safety Canada, the feds have banned more than 1,500 types of assault-style guns since 2020 and are launching the buyback program to get "assault-style firearms" out of Canadian communities.
The way the buyback program would work is simple. In exchange for the banned firearms, the feds will pay owners a market price, so that the weapon is permanently removed from Canadian households.
]According to the government, owners of the banned firearms must either participate in the buyback program, have their gun "rendered inoperable" at the government's expense or have it "otherwise lawfully disposed."
And while none of the proposed prices are finalized, gun owners could get up to $6,209 in return for giving up their firearms.
Along with a pay scale and explanation of how the program works, the feds are asking Canadians to fill out a survey to determine if they think the prices for the banned weapons are fair and accurately reflect market rates.
The lowest price Ottawa is proposing for a buyback is $1,139 for any Vz58 rifles.
]The second lowest proposed buy-back price is $1,337 for AR platform guns, which include the AR-15, M16 and AR-10.
From there, prices go up, with M14 rifles going for $2,612 and Robinson Armament firearms for $2,735.
Guns that have a bore diameter — diameter of the gun's barrel — of more than 20mm could be bought for $2,684 and those with a muzzle energy of more than 10,000 Joules could be bought for $2,819.
The highest proposed buyback price — $6,209 — is for both the SG-550 rifle and SG-551 carbine.
The figures also apply to any modifications or variants of the specific firearms.
The rates were chosen by analyzing manufacturer and retailer prices, foreign retailer prices, pricing guidebooks and auction listings, with the manufacturer and Canadian retail prices getting priority.
This update on the buyback program comes after legislation was proposed earlier this year by the Liberal government that would put a freeze on handgun purchases, as well as a limit on how many bullets a "long gun" can carry.
The feds have also considered a law prohibiting anyone with a criminal history of domestic violence or criminal harassment — stalking — from buying a firearm in Canada.
i would say something but i am not allowed to swear on the site
By no means i have clue about the real market values of them guns-and by no means i endorse these steps-because for sure ,this will not limit any criminal from carrying out any unlawful act with any kind of gun : yet (i do not know prices)it seems reasonably high prices are set ?!
This will maybe help some not to endure financial loss,just morale loss.
Definition of "buy back".
"The buying back of goods by the original seller".
Last time I checked the government of Canada isn't in the business of selling guns.
So if some-one is forced to sell items that belong to them isn't it really an all out confiscation of goods?
We need an election like yesterday!!!
Interestingly enough, if it's a static price set, this will likely be challenged, and wind up with an extension, as the amounts being assessed don't necessarily match up with the value of some.
Some people who own rifles in .50BMG are in possession of firearms that far exceeded the $3K mark when purchased. On the face of it, it won't survive that challenge, as with all "appropriation" of private property, it has to be done at fair market value. Not an arbitrary number pulled out of a hat.
To Badenoch's point....mass refusal to comply may be just fine for some....do so at your own peril. ( I'd also keep from advertising same on forums and social media).
Another Liberal ploy attempting to do what appears to be something, when it will actually end as achieving nothing. Plus it serve to ensure the well being of the cross border health of the illegal firearm trade. They are attempting the buy back with law abiding citizens, I can't imagine many criminal casting in on the scheme, unless they can pick up guns on the other side of the border cheaply so they can sell them to the Canadian government and make a profit. Are there to be any checks to ensure this isn't going to happen? I could see such an operation, using a number of straw sellers.
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
Remember when guns were not considered "Scarey". I use to bring my guns to school in my car, so I could go hunting afterwards, that was 38 years ago for me. We left in the car and went hunting after school. When my Mom was a little girl (Age 12) they use to bring their guns in the class room and go rabbit hunting during lunch.
Liberals and their supporters have made it their mission to define ALL GUN OWNERS as evil and as criminals.
X2. It's a total shame the path this country is going down. Poor Canada. As far as guns being scary not a chance! Only the anal orifice standing behind it is what one should be concerned about. With the laws in this country it shouldn't be a issue but instead of dealing with the obvious problems the Liberals prefer to sweep legal and law abiding owners into the same piles as the excrement that it creating the problems as it requires less work which we all know work is a foreign word to a liberal.
way more money than i told the wife tha i paid, hope she doesnt see this lol