https://mnrwatch.com/6500-in-fines-1...ose-decoy/?amp
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
Printable View
https://mnrwatch.com/6500-in-fines-1...ose-decoy/?amp
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
They do this ALOT in the states with remote control decoys and such. In my opinion he should lose his licence for way longer than 1 year?
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I agree, should be 3-5 years.
This was preventable… basic Hunter safety stuff. Sadly too many guys ruin their hunting trips because of stupidity. The fines are one thing but the grief from the spouse just piles on.
I feel somewhat sorrow for this fellow hunter this must be very embarrassing for him, today with so much social media the incident is so much more public which makes it worse. The grief could even continue with problems renewing a firearms licence?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Menard
Yes, it would be hard to argue that is wasn't unsafe handling of a firearm? Although he is required to re-take the Hunter Education course again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilroy
Lifetime ban from owning a firearm would be appropriate!!
From the description in the article,CO's had controlled access to the area while the decoy was deployed. That means that the dummy had to go passed the CO's at the traffic points. I guess it didn't dawn on him that something was up. He still shot down the road at the decoy ( likely destroying it @ $3K each) and the guys were all over him like white on rice. That takes a very special level of stupid to pull that crap. He should lose his hunting license permanently. I wonder why he wasn't charged criminally? There certainly should have been ample evidence for them.
I think he got away lightly for such a illegal and dangerous act. He should be ashamed and his family and friends probably already knew what kind of man he was.
rodmcd
Good result, but the MNRF should make it crystal clear which roads are safe to shoot on and which are not as the interpretation could get cloudy sometimes. E.g. Is an ATV trail barely big enough to fit an ATV and filled with vegetation considered a road? when does it become a road for purposes of this rule.
Also, what happened to that hunter last year where he shot 2 moose by the side of the road on Hwy 17? https://northernontario.ctvnews.ca/v...tion-1.5644396. People were saying that there were apparent violations: shooting from a traveled portion of a roadway, no hunter orange, and having a loaded firearm on a roadway. I don't see a charge in the records for him.
I believe that man was a First Nation band member and the incident took place on the reserve. A few karens made a fuss over it, but otherwise nothing much to see here, move along....Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahuntr300
It depends a lot in which area the road is in. The general rule-of-thumb is described as a "municipality maintained road......" which most roads in the south fall under,although,there seems to be some exceptions. In the north central and northern Ontario,most forest access roads are unmaintained and in a lot of cases,are almost grown over. These don't fall under the regulations. The forest access road leading to our drop off point to access our camp is usually lined with road hunters during Moose and Deer seasons. It looks like the proverbial "pumpkin picket line" on some days particularly from about 3PM until dark. Making a beer run into the village can be a tad unnerving.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahuntr300
This guy was convicted a few years back for shooting a deer while trespassing if I remember right. He was looking for sympathy on here under a username of Sparkie or something like that.
You must mean this guyQuote:
Originally Posted by redd foxx
https://www.oodmag.com/community/sho...d+tracking+dog
Remember thread thread well as caused some grief between members for and against until the charge came out.
If it is the initail punishment wasn't enough and certainly a second incident should of been harsher
I just read the entire thread, quite a few posters have moved on! Anyway, what’s obvious to me about that particular episode was that some folks believed Sparky’s story (several anti-enforcement folks) , whereas others had questions/doubts. We’ll never know the whole story I guess.Quote:
Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers
I just read that entire thread,too,and you're right. Most of those posters are long gone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Menard
It looks like Sparky was not embarrassed enough with his first conviction and decided to double down and get another. As you were saying that takes a special kind of stupid. LOL I take it back I dont feel sorry for him anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by trimmer21
Mind you I have to give it to him
- Replies: 131
- Views: 55,299
That has to some sort of record.
That is the same guy. Thanks for finding it. I know who he is.Quote:
You must mean this guy
https://www.oodmag.com/community/sho...d+tracking+dog
Remember thread thread well as caused some grief between members for and against until the charge came out.
If it is the initail punishment wasn't enough and certainly a second incident should of been harsher