Originally Posted by
rick_iles
TR...there is case law from probably 25 or 30 years ago, that dealt with basically your situation. An individual went to hunt at a very large controlled hunting marsh in Dover Twp, was caught and charged with shooting over bait. As I remember it, she was initially convicted, but the conviction was overturned on appeal. Her defence was, she was not responsible for placing the bait, that she only arrived at the marsh to hunt in the dark, and had no knowledge of the bait. It was the Chappin decision if I remember correctly.
As far as seizing the dog, I highly doubt that as the dog was not used in the commission of any offence. She is only used to retrieve an already harvested bird.