Ottawa "shooting" - Scary situation for everyone involved
Here is an article that is a bit deceptive at first - it talks about a bullet that was fired through the wall of a residential house in Barrhaven (Ottawa). At first it sounds like your typical gang related dishcharge, but once I saw a picture of the bullet, I thought "that looks more like a hunting style bullet than a handgun bullet". Anyways, as I read further, there is mention of people hunting in a forrested area near the house.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa...aven-1.2947468
I looked at a satellite image and thought, wow, there is no way firearm discharge is allowed there. I checked the bylaw, and it seems that discharge is possibly allowed in the area, except for the fact that there is now a subdivision there. There is a clause in the bylaw which states that discharge is not allowed in otherwise permitted areas "on land on a registered plan of subdivision once an application for a building permit has been received by the City of Ottawa; or within 450 meters of land on a registered plan of subdivision once an application for a building permit has been received by the City of Ottawa". It looks like someone was either not up to speed on the bylaw, or the bullet travelled more than 450 m. In any even, if this discharge was legal, the shooter really should have verified that there was a safe backstop. It looks like the bylaw schedule in question needs to be updated now that there is a subdivision there (http://ottawa.ca/sites/ottawa.ca/fil..._123469358.jpg). Anyways, this just illustrates the difficulty in hunting on the fringes of an expanding city, and how important it is to know the bylaws (and your backstop). Scary situation for all involved.
EDIT: The article has now been edited to remove the reference to hunting in the area, and they have replaced that statement with: "Staff Sgt. Ken Bryden said it appears the bullet was shot with a small-calibre long gun." I wonder what that change is all about?