Originally Posted by
JBen
Haven't done a lot of camp hunting, but this subject seems to come up a lot. While "shooter first option" has merit I wonder if it's the fairest.
Multiple shooters as above is one potential problem. Especially if any of the shots/wounds leave fatality in question. Whose shot was it that downed it?
But I also wonder about less tangible things.
Its just above freezing, damp and miserable and one guy has been doing a lot of the pushing/drives.
Its arguable at least to me, that those doing the drives do more to put the buck in the shooters way, than the shooter who happened to be in the right place that day.
Not sure if there's a right or wrong. Knowing myself, if I ran a hunt camp I might give thought to a simple lottery system at the start of the week. First name drawn has first dibs (guys who may not want anymore can pass, there by increasing the others odds).
True,we all want any rack on our wall to be one we ourselves shot.
I'm thinking if I'm sitting a stand, sipping warm coffee, fairly dry and comfortabl, not busting a sweat, and a nice 10pter or more comes busting out into my shooting lane... All I've done is pull the trigger, someone else did all the work