TIME TO SWING THE POLE OUR WAY GUYS.
FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW NEAR AND FAR
VOTE!
http://www.thesudburystar.com/2016/0...ssary-predator
Printable View
TIME TO SWING THE POLE OUR WAY GUYS.
FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW NEAR AND FAR
VOTE!
http://www.thesudburystar.com/2016/0...ssary-predator
Bunny-hugger article. "nuf said.
I submitted my vote
My vote is in!
Voted!
no is still outnumbering yes votes 2:1....scary thought.... I voted as well thx for posting
To me the readers survey does not match the article which i find is usually the case as these are surveys that the writer creates. The question posed is "Should it become easier to hunt wolves in Ontario?". No where in the article do they mention that Ontario is making it easier to kill wolfs. All they say is
"At present Ontarians are allowed to hunt wolves, but must purchase a seal (which costs about $11) and can only harvest two per year, whether they are grey wolves or coyotes.
But a legislative change has been proposed, noted Barron, that would remove the requirement to purchase a seal, as well as "open the bag limit for coyotes in Northern Ontario."
It does not say they are removing the bag limit of 2 on wolves only removing the seal requirement which to me having to buy a seal doesn't make it harder to kill your limit of wolfs.
These surveys don't mean anything other than to engage the reader in providing false hope.
Also, this group is also focused on wolfs, they mentioned nothing about the coyote changes which to me would be the biggest change by opening the bag limit.
Just my 2 cents on the article.
I'd expect an article like that in southern Ontario BUT not in Sudbury! or Timmins or North Bay.
I would when it comes to bunny huggers and newspaper sales. BS baffles brains,every time.Quote:
Originally Posted by SK33T3R
Skewing poll results doesnt have any value to me. Id rsther get a notion of what actual public perception is (yes, I realize it could be skewed the otherway too).
So? Did you vote? Sure it's a goofy poll but if you're going to read the ridiculous article then why not vote. It's bull#*it articles like this - over and over - that sway the rest of the undecided. Our complacency has gotten us to where we are today!Quote:
Originally Posted by blasted_saber
Anti's are well know for skewing results.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blasted_saber
SK33T3R, Thanks for posting, what a one sided article and slanting of the facts. Same misinformation style campaign they use against us in regards to African hunting being applied here.
Interesting argument by increasing the cull of wolves, rather than reducing their numbers, it leads to the breakdown of pack units and ends up fostering splinter groups, which leads to the development of additional packs and in turn increases the level of predation on the local herbivores. If there is any veracity to this, and there just might be having read studies on wolf family units, then it would be better to retain the current limits on the number of wolves that can be culled. Otherwise you can continue to watch the decline in the numbers of moose tags being made available. Of course, if you would rather dine on wolf instead of moose by all means vote against this proposal. But just maybe, you should be voting in favour it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SK33T3R
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
I'm not too sure what you guys were expected but 40/60 is actually a pretty good result!
I bet that for 90% of people, wolf should have priority on us. Meaning, we got grocery store and they don't......
vote is in
Attachment 32285We shot this wolf on Sunday.
The anti's were winning the bear pole too and look what happened!!
You were always able to take 2 wolves a year. Still only 2 wolves, what's the problem??
Voted still 60,40
Why is there a collar on that supposed wolf ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowwalker
Maybe they are tracking it? There was a thread on here recently about wolves killing an elk caught on camera and one of the wolves was wearing a collar. Or it could be a dog lolQuote:
Originally Posted by jaycee
here is the article i mentioned http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/blo...rpass-in-banff
Check out the eye color. They look like Husky blue,to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaycee
And that also!Quote:
Originally Posted by trimmer21
Sure does not look like a wolf to me. that is why I said " supposed wolf ".
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaycee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guelph1981
And that gentlemen is why most hunters don't go around shooting the Neighbour's dog..Quote:
Originally Posted by trimmer21
I was going to ask if anyone noticed anything about the wolf, but jaycee didn't even give me time.
The antis using that dog, is an example of how they use deception for their arguments. Just like in 1996, the bear alliance used a picture of 7 hanging bears with no tags to shut down Ontario's spring hunt. The bears they used in the ad were not taken in Ontario.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SK33T3R
If if you haven't noticed, Sudbury is Liberal and becoming more and more the Toronto of the North