I think you will find this interesting - wonder how things would have fallen out in Canada - the same? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFSxxi7D4mM
Printable View
I think you will find this interesting - wonder how things would have fallen out in Canada - the same? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFSxxi7D4mM
Nothing would have happen because no one would care that a guy stand legally on the street doing nothing wrong. You see that's the difference, we don't live in fear up here of our government, stranger, neighbor and so on..... I got a good laugh at 15:05, the cop mentioning it's about to be the Ramadan so......
We hang out on Parliament hill and have a picnic if we want to, we don't cause problems for our police.
I see 3 very respectful police officers here chatting with this guy, not really sure where you were going with this post, cute blond there though, too bad this guy wasted 24 minutes of time for 3 police officers and all of that time is paid by the taxpayer.
Yes - the lady cop kinda looked like Shirley McClain - wasn't going anywhere really - just thought it would be interesting -
I thought the first cop was a pretty good talker. And in many other countries if a cop ask for your ID and you refuse to show it, you go straight the station.
- I was close - http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/Holly...irley-MacLaine
Most municipalities have loitering by-laws where it's an offense to just hang around for no apparent reason. Police may ask you to simply move along. In Canada,when a cop asks you to identify yourself,we're legally bound to provide our name,address and date of birth. Canadians are NOT obligated to answer any other questions.
He came out way better than the Codified LAW allows.......It was apparent he was trying to initiate a response.
You are not required to carry "papers"in the US. However if operating a vehicle you are required to provide DL.
Since he wasn't doing anything other than trying to initiate a response he should have gotten what the law allows in Terry vs Ohio, deemed a "Terry Stop". It allows for searching for weapons during police interaction during a casual/incidental contact for the officer's protection.
Waste of 24 minutes with an azzhat confused about his "rights" and authorities that saw it for what it was.
Not sure how the 5th Amend. got into this abortion.
Can you provide an example of the law that requires this other than when found committing a offense under numerous Provincial Acts or Federal Codes.
Which law requires any one to identify themselves to an officer unless they are found committing a offense?
Without a offense being committed these are just fishing expositions.
Nope. I'm sure you can do your own research. There's a few lawyers that have their own websites which answer fundamental questions.
If in doubt,ask a Police Constable. They'll be glad to explain it to you. Generally,if they're investigating an incident and think you may be a person of interest,they're legally entitled to ask any questions they deem appropriate and if you act like a dick,you're going to the bucket until you smarten up. It never,ever pays to be a dick.
Unless your Trump!
OK I will bite... what special interest group is that?
Gord, you and I know. That's enough for me. However it wasn't about you but thanks for coming out.
Here is an Richardhead example of a Lefty Canadian PS worker and by the looks of him in a very very special interest group and one of his posts about Ft. Mac.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...weet-1.3567368
Nope. Been there twice, once when participating in a legal picket outside a local business that ripped off a friend, and the influential business owner called the police, and once while enjoying a beverage on a patio bar when an officer decided to shake down the Harley rider. I was asked for ID in both cases and politely refused. In the case of the protest, the officer told those of us involved (very young adults) that we could not block entrances or driveways, and asked for our IDs. When one participant began to provide same I interjected and informed him that he was not legally obliged to. The officer was a bit vexed but agreed that I was correct. In the case of the patio bar episode, the officer said "no sweat, I'll just call in your plate", so I showed him my license to save him the effort. But I was not obliged to, and he recognized that.
http://svan.ca/police-rights/