We better keep that boarder closed for a bit longer until their death wish is complete.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...hings-n1188911
Printable View
We better keep that boarder closed for a bit longer until their death wish is complete.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...hings-n1188911
Land of the free....
Free to die from your own stupidity...
Unbelievable ! Mind you when you look at what comes out of the mouth from the leader of their pack it's like "monkey see, monkey do".
If you read his statement, you notice the new ( NBC ) media, is slanting the facts.
You have to remember if a Conservative in the states cured cancer, they would be roasted over the coals for putting Millions of researchers out of work.
A Humorous example of how Conservative politicians are viewed by the Democrat Media.
https://pin.it/1kdqWot
Florida opened its beaches on there deadliest day . I think 1400 new confirmed cases yesterday in Florida. I thinks 4 or 5 states are trying to open back up too soon. Some states ordered all businesses back to work on Friday. They are so stupid lol. Yet others are continuing to lock down and put more strict restrictions on. Guess it depends on how your govenor feels about this disease and the pressure his people are putting them in.
What I do know is the USA has done some intensive testing so they would have a better understanding of the spread 5han us in Canada
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
No one has been, or is ordering workers back to work. GEORGIA for example is ALLOWING some ( not all ) businesses to reopen if they can comply with some restrictions.Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood
Not the storm the beaches type order the Liberal Media is trying to make it sound.
Yes your right . I know retail stores aloud to open curbside. But I thought I heard tattoo and hair salons were also aloud to open but can't finds them. That is why I said everything or all. Apparently it's only half million people that will be going back to work. Lots of protesters not helping but the governor says it's worth dying for, from his views he will save the economy and take the loss of lifeQuote:
Originally Posted by Snowwalker
https://www.newsweek.com/texas-lt-go...arlson-1499106
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Are you reading the text of his address or just the liberal news reports?Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood
Based on the original posts link I find it appalling that anyone be it politician or private citizen would say it's ok to sacrifice human life for the sake of making a buck !
As for a Republican curing cancer ? Fat chance ! They are making too much money off of related businesses they invested in. Good if they did ! They could put them to work on all the other illnesses that are out there. Mmmmmmmmmm like maybe Covid 19 ?
The big pharmaceutical companies you love to hate are mostly Conservative.Quote:
Originally Posted by longpointer
Big big business. Of course they are. Not surprised at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowwalker
Yup,......... let’s keep that border closed,
http://https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-disinfectant-light-reaction-1.5543563
It's been happening for a while now many have died from drinking chemicals as a disinfectant. Sad really like what are they thinking?. Over 500 deaths in iran and thousands poisoned sickened or blinded from the chemicals .Quote:
Originally Posted by 73hunter
https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/hea...1_4870674.html
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
I read it, its there they posted itQuote:
Originally Posted by Snowwalker
The governor stated they needed to go back to work to save the economy for his children his grandchildren and for the people. . He said he didnt want to die and no one does but they have to open the economy back up.
He doubled down on his words. There is more important things than living he says.
Its Obvious he will sacrifice human life for the economy. .
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Well my fishy ;) friend here is something to chew over. Stats say that if 100 people get convid-19:Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood
77 will have from no symptoms to symptoms of a bad flu.
23 will be hospitalized, of which 21 will recover.
That is a fatality rates of 2%.
Now if you remove the elderly and vulnerable from that population, the death rate falls to 1 in 250,000 or less.
As one that is out on the front lines, I can tell you this. Persons still out here working have a far odds chance of survival, then our fathers and Grandfathers did from 1938( Japan in Asia) to 1945.
Tell us how you remove the elderly and vulnerable from the population.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowwalker
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
From the population, by looking at persons in the age range of the workforce in the stats and not including person of retirement age and above.Quote:
Originally Posted by GW11
Since the most at risk are retired, or retired and in homes we should also use extra precautions to protect them because of their increased risk.
Precautions, yes, but they can't be "removed" from the population. No matter what, elderly and vulnerable must be cared for by those younger and healthier, which means they are at risk of exposure. You or I might be "vulnerable", and not know it. Plenty of underlying conditions go undiagnosed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowwalker
It's easy enough to say "it's just the sick and elderly, we have to carry on", not so easy to do.
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
Removing them from the population in the statistical data means adjusting the sample.Quote:
Originally Posted by GW11
For example:
If we sample kids from 1 year to 20 years old to see the employment rate, it would be very low. The population of the sample is every kid from one to 20 years old. If we remove the NON work force aged kids from the population ( reducing the sample to only relevant kids) and only use kids from about 14 to 20 years old, the rate gets a lot higher.
The inverse is true with Covid-19 cases. If we look at the work force aged people and do not include the retired or vulnerable people that would not and should not join out and about, both the numbers of cases of hospitalized people and the number of deaths drop to fractions of a percent.
Now age is not the only thing that makes a person vulnerable, but anyone that is should be protected as much as we can.
If you do not feel safe returning to work, then I would not suggest that you do. There is not and will not be anyone forcing you to do so.
Personally. I have "Gone over Top " and stormed the walls enough times in my life, I have likely been living on some else's time for a very long time.
Your edited post after I quoted your original was clearer, thanks. Mathematically remove them from the equation. Looks good, makes sense to isolate them and get on with things, but I think we can agree that it's a lot easier said than done.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowwalker
I don't envy the decision makers. We're trying to hold back natural selection at work. It might be a new virus, but disease culling the old and sick from an overcrowded population is not a new thing in nature. We've done a decent job of suppressing the virus, but it's like having caught a bee under a glass. What do you do now? Quite a situation.
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
Do nothing, just like Trump did....Quote:
Originally Posted by GW11