Mandated Vaccines - The law - Read about your rights

[line052]

I am privy to corporate info that describes the corporate position on firings of UnVaxxed employees and they are aware of the legal implications and how you cannot fire someone for this. The position exists within contract law and signed terms of employment, union agreements and individual contracts for work.

Corporations are changing hiring criteria to include must be vaxxed in new term of employment offers and union negotiaions (especially Public Service), it will now be in the union members hands to vote in those changes or not. It will then be the out for employers to include contract terms in agreements.

This is how forced coercion is enacted, I have always said it will never be the public sector that feels the pressure but the private sector that reacts first due to liability.

Lastly, to reiterate the FEDs have never enacted the EMA on a national level and until they do - Section 1 of charter which allows the Feds to suspend all other Charter rights in a national emergency (such as forcing vax on PS), can never be enforced.

I still believe the Libs will get a majority (I hope not), because of the gifts of tax payer money they have gave away to the detriment of our children's debt. I also believe the PPC will gain about 40 seats in the election.

Even it if the Libs get another minority the GR/NDP have already confirmed they stand with Lib minority, and form government.

Are you awake yet? Do you care about freedoms and rights, because this is the last chance to vote out the 4 main parties. If not our children's children will be fighting the war to gain back freedoms and rights.

[Badenoch]

I am privy to corporate info that describes the corporate position on firings of UnVaxxed employees and they are aware of the legal implications and how you cannot fire someone for this. The position exists within contract law and signed terms of employment, union agreements and individual contracts for work.

Corporations are changing hiring criteria to include must be vaxxed in new term of employment offers and union negotiaions (especially Public Service), it will now be in the union members hands to vote in those changes or not. It will then be the out for employers to include contract terms in agreements.

This is how forced coercion is enacted, I have always said it will never be the public sector that feels the pressure but the private sector that reacts first due to liability.

Lastly, to reiterate the FEDs have never enacted the EMA on a national level and until they do - Section 1 of charter which allows the Feds to suspend all other Charter rights in a national emergency (such as forcing vax on PS), can never be enforced.

I still believe the Libs will get a majority (I hope not), because of the gifts of tax payer money they have gave away to the detriment of our children's debt. I also believe the PPC will gain about 40 seats in the election.

Even it if the Libs get another minority the GR/NDP have already confirmed they stand with Lib minority, and form government.

Are you awake yet? Do you care about freedoms and rights, because this is the last chance to vote out the 4 main parties. If not our children's children will be fighting the war to gain back freedoms and rights.

Whatever mystery corporate info you've seen is contrary to blue chip Bay Street legal firms who are imposing mandatory vaccination and testing requirements for their employees.

Ontario's largest long term care companies have announced mandatory vaccination requirements for their staff and those who refuse will be put on unpaid leave. UHN in Toronto has committed to firing employees who refuse to get vaccinated. These are organizations that hire the best legal representatives as opposed to your mystery corporate info the source of which you have not revealed.

In Ontario you can fire anyone for anything. All you have to do is be prepared to pay appropriate severance and it's still an open question whether the courts would rule that firing anti-vaxxers in the interests of workplace safety would fall within the definition of termination with cause.

[impact]

Still puffing up your chest about mandating vaccine for everyone Badenoch.
Do you have shares in those companies or simply paid to promote?

[Badenoch]

Still puffing up your chest about mandating vaccine for everyone Badenoch.
Do you have shares in those companies or simply paid to promote?

LOL. The same amount as Rocco Galati is paying you to help him fleece the gullible and stupid.

[Gregger17]

I would guess anyone who works in the “Healthcare” sector and is not getting vaccinated is looking for the “easy street” out$$$. I’m sure there the same ones that can’t wait too get outside and drive another cigarette down there lungs lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[impact]

I would guess anyone who works in the “Healthcare” sector and is not getting vaccinated is looking for the “easy street” out$$$. I’m sure there the same ones that can’t wait too get outside and drive another cigarette down there lungs lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Educate yourself.

https://ottawasun.com/news/local-new...9-0f22cc057424

"It started just days after she received her second dose of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Red, blistering spots that were painful and burned began showing up on her legs. Within weeks, she was in the hospital, unable to walk because of the pain."

[WillieBeno]

Whatever mystery corporate info you've seen is contrary to blue chip Bay Street legal firms who are imposing mandatory vaccination and testing requirements for their employees.

Ontario's largest long term care companies have announced mandatory vaccination requirements for their staff and those who refuse will be put on unpaid leave. UHN in Toronto has committed to firing employees who refuse to get vaccinated. These are organizations that hire the best legal representatives as opposed to your mystery corporate info the source of which you have not revealed.

In Ontario you can fire anyone for anything. All you have to do is be prepared to pay appropriate severance and it's still an open question whether the courts would rule that firing anti-vaxxers in the interests of workplace safety would fall within the definition of termination with cause.

No one is an antivaxxer until the experimental gene therapy is approved maybe you could stop using the derogatory term to promote your fantasy man dates as others have to be warned by mods to not call you out for what you really are, the term does little to legitimize your fantasies. Approval is unlikely as they don't work and as time goes on sub acute and long term along with already realized acute side effects will have their cure deemed worse than the disease. Furthermore when the use of ivermectin as a treatment becomes the norm and all the duped realize that they have been had all who have coerced their victims/employees will be sued into oblivion or worse. As for staff that are put on unpaid leave for refusing the experiment I'm sure they will figure out that it is essentially a constructive dismissal with prejudice and seek remedial remuneration as well as other damages. Even the best legal representatives will not be able to legitimately successfully litigate their case based on hope and not science that they can't provide. Kinda like trying to hit a target with the nicest gun on the range with only BS for shells. Now excuse me while I go clean my shoe.
https://rumble.com/vleq43-informed-c...f=6zof&mrefc=2

[GW11]

Whatever mystery corporate info you've seen is contrary to blue chip Bay Street legal firms who are imposing mandatory vaccination and testing requirements for their employees.

Ontario's largest long term care companies have announced mandatory vaccination requirements for their staff and those who refuse will be put on unpaid leave. UHN in Toronto has committed to firing employees who refuse to get vaccinated. These are organizations that hire the best legal representatives as opposed to your mystery corporate info the source of which you have not revealed.

In Ontario you can fire anyone for anything. All you have to do is be prepared to pay appropriate severance and it's still an open question whether the courts would rule that firing anti-vaxxers in the interests of workplace safety would fall within the definition of termination with cause.

Your last paragraph is false information.

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk

[Badenoch]

Your last paragraph is false information.

Is there a court decision to the contrary, one that rules firing a person for being unvaccinated is termination without cause? If so please post a link.

[GW11]

Is there a court decision to the contrary, one that rules firing a person for being unvaccinated is termination without cause? If so please post a link.

In a unionized environment (which in related threads you also attempt to be an expert), most termination cases where just cause cannot be proven by the company an arbitrator will award the employee their job back and a settlement for their missed time.

In the 8 terminations I've dealt with in the past 3 years, 7 were reinstated with no loss of benefits, seniority or pay.

No link needed to prove that you can't fire anyone for any reason depending on the severance. Keep trying to prove yourself as credible though, the entertainment is second to none.

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk