-
January 19th, 2022, 02:27 PM
#21

Originally Posted by
Badenoch
The point is over a quarter of Canadians would delight in seeing anti-vaxxers behind bars. Personally I don't share that view because they are pretty much under house arrest already.
Lmao, you cannot possibly take this seriously..
"online panel of 1,506 Canadians"
And that's only the id...ots that have nothing better to do with their time but to answer online polls.
And now they derive all these scary statements how "quarter of Canadians " supports something or 67 percent support something else.
Hilarious..
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
Last edited by newbiehunter; January 19th, 2022 at 02:32 PM.
-
January 19th, 2022 02:27 PM
# ADS
-
January 19th, 2022, 02:48 PM
#22
Agreed I wouldn’t put much faith in this poll but the fact that anyone agrees is disgusting
-
January 19th, 2022, 02:56 PM
#23

Originally Posted by
GloryHole
While all men aren't created equally your personal outlook of the stouthearted is refreshing and yet contemporaneously disenchantingly irritating and is only eclipsed by those "Canadians" that occupy an existence of perpetual fear and gullibility that serves only to sustain ones own demise.
Your effort to disguise the true formatting of the propaganda is admiral but unappreciated due to it's ill favoured character. To beguile the notion of something reputable would be preposterously absurd giving consideration of acknowledgement to the certitude of ones own admission.
Attachment 43162
Did you have a thesaurus handy for that statement
-
January 19th, 2022, 03:03 PM
#24

Originally Posted by
cramadog2
Did you have a thesaurus handy for that statement
Of course. "Use the tools."
-
January 19th, 2022, 03:23 PM
#25

Originally Posted by
cramadog2
Did you have a thesaurus handy for that statement
I hope that isn't a incarcerable offence from your perspective.
-
January 19th, 2022, 05:14 PM
#26

Originally Posted by
cramadog2
Did you have a thesaurus handy for that statement
He'd should get a refund for a thesaurus that can't tell him the difference between "admiral" and "admirable." 

Originally Posted by
GloryHole
Your effort to disguise the true formatting of the propaganda is admiral but unappreciated due to it's ill favoured character. To beguile the notion of something reputable would be preposterously absurd giving consideration of acknowledgement to the certitude of ones own admission.
Last edited by Badenoch; January 19th, 2022 at 05:17 PM.
-
January 19th, 2022, 05:20 PM
#27

Originally Posted by
newbiehunter
Lmao, you cannot possibly take this seriously..
"online panel of 1,506 Canadians"
And that's only the id...ots that have nothing better to do with their time but to answer online polls.
And now they derive all these scary statements how "quarter of Canadians " supports something or 67 percent support something else.
Hilarious..
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk
Thank you!!!!!!
Everyone should take note of the very few people polled. No need to get all knotted up. Incredible how quick the anger level went up, up and away. If anything this article worked to illicit a response, and quickly. Like all media, take it with a grain of salt.
-
January 19th, 2022, 05:21 PM
#28
So what you are saying is that of the 1506 people surveyed 73% are opposed to jail time for those who are unvaccinated and 63% are against denial of publicly funded health care.
Looks like a vast majority are against this to me, even with a survey of only 1506 people on an online forum, not a broad spectrum survey.
-
January 19th, 2022, 06:09 PM
#29
Last edited by GloHole; January 19th, 2022 at 06:19 PM.
-
January 19th, 2022, 06:19 PM
#30

Originally Posted by
Birdbuff
Thank you!!!!!!
Everyone should take note of the very few people polled. No need to get all knotted up. Incredible how quick the anger level went up, up and away. If anything this article worked to illicit a response, and quickly. Like all media, take it with a grain of salt.
Completely agree on this one [emoji3526][emoji3526]
Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk