-
November 28th, 2022, 11:57 AM
#121
You don’t have to be partisan to disagree with the liberals I’m non partisan but facts are facts. Since the liberals have been in violent crime, inflation, and emissions are up. Their carbon tax and gun grabs have done nothing to help, but have robbed lawful responsible gun owners of their firearms, and put many people in a bad financial spot.
They say the only good wolf is a dead wolf, If that’s the case than I’ve reformed many a wolf.
-
November 28th, 2022 11:57 AM
# ADS
-
November 28th, 2022, 12:13 PM
#122
I still can't reply with a post,but,yeah,I needed a break for a while. Uncle Bill................now,that's funny right there. ROFL
When you're dead,you don't know you're dead. The pain is felt by others. It's the same when you're stupid.
-
November 28th, 2022, 12:49 PM
#123
"Yes, I obey the laws of the land as passed by a democratically elected government, that is the standard."
So when they say jump you say how high ?
If the law they are making is silly and is not justified its all ok because a minority government told you its a good thing to do?. It does absolutely nothing to continually bann these guns.
Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk
-
November 28th, 2022, 01:51 PM
#124
fishfood,
"So when they say jump you say how high ?
If the law they are making is silly and is not justified its all ok because a minority government told you its a good thing to do?. It does absolutely nothing to continually bann these guns."
Well let me flip this on you, I liked the long gun registry for a whole bunch of reasons and the money had been spent. To me it was silly and not justified to scrap the registry. It was silly for Conservative voters to believe the Liberals would take this sitting down. I told you all so right on this forum.
So we are now in this situation, I am pretty sure the Liberals know full well that if they upset gun owners but mostly hunters and farmers they will suffer in an election.
So they have chosen to walk a fine line and keep most normal hunting type firearms legal, 742 for example and banned others.
-
November 28th, 2022, 01:59 PM
#125
Gilroy
please define "normal hunting gun"?
-
November 28th, 2022, 02:29 PM
#126
Whatever Big Daddy Trudeau tells him it is clearly.
Seriously though guys I've been eating a pound of leather a day trying to get used to the taste. Can anyone who already loves it please reccomend a particular brand of boot that they find tasty?
/s just in case you weren't sure.
-
November 28th, 2022, 02:55 PM
#127
Many people use the sks as a hunting rifle because it’s cheap and it use’s cheap ammo.
They say the only good wolf is a dead wolf, If that’s the case than I’ve reformed many a wolf.
-
November 28th, 2022, 03:00 PM
#128
Do you support this bill Gilroy? If so why? Is it because you think it will reduce gun violence, or is just because it’s from the liberals?
They say the only good wolf is a dead wolf, If that’s the case than I’ve reformed many a wolf.
-
November 28th, 2022, 03:15 PM
#129
Every time I see a new ban list I'm grateful to Stephen Harper for disbanding the gun registry. It's harder to for governments to confiscate guns when it doesn't know where they are and who owns them.
-
November 28th, 2022, 03:16 PM
#130
DanE;1206292]Gilroy
please define "normal hunting gun"?[/QUOTE]
Well considering what is happening my opinion and even yours of what a "normal hunting gun" might or might not be is irrelevant.
What is relevant is what the "general voting public" accepts as a normal hunting gun because that is what they might vote to ban or might not.
So the pro gun lobby have been making the big mistake for years, instead of the various organisations beating up the Liberals they should be educating the public with a massive media campaign and maybe highlighting normal hunting guns.
Under estimating the public's ability to differentiate between various types of firearms is a mistake made time and time again by Conservatives.
The winners in this game are the Liberals who then simply tell the public what firearms are more a danger.