Liberals withdraw Bill C-21 amendment

[Gilroy]

It David Cameron who set the referendum. A majority of voters in the referendum chose to leave the EU. There was also a general election in which the people of Great Britain elected the party that supported leaving the EU. The people spoke and the government listened.

The vote was very close and history has shown us that pandering to nationalist might not be the best policy. This move by Conservatives to stay in power at any cost has basically bankrupted the UK economy, this would be akin to Prime Minister Trudeau taking Canada out of NAFTA and abandoning our biggest trade partner. When you promise the people that you will make GB Great again and you end up with this mess the Conservatives own it.

[Gilroy]

Well here ya go boys: Marco Mendocino just announced “We are now getting to work with our parliamentary colleagues to craft a clear solution that will keep assault-style weapons off our streets,”
He said this this afternoon. TC

Nothin new here they made it an election promise back in the last general election. Are they taking away our hunting guns, no.

[trimmer21]

Nothin new here they made it an election promise back in the last general election. Are they taking away our hunting guns, no.

After the last hoot and howl,the great "back off" is only temporary. Make no mistake,they'll be back with something worse.

[Badenoch]

After the last hoot and howl,the great "back off" is only temporary. Make no mistake,they'll be back with something worse.

I'm not expecting it to be worse just more focused on the "assault-style rifles" they missed in the first OIC.

[trimmer21]

I'm not expecting it to be worse just more focused on the "assault-style rifles" they missed in the first OIC.

If anyone forced the Liberals to define "assault-style",their gun control agenda would fall apart on them.

[DanE]

This is far from over
after all the liberals have until 2030 to 100% disarm the Canadian public to meet the agreement they signed with the UN

[Gilroy]

If anyone forced the Liberals to define "assault-style",their gun control agenda would fall apart on them.

Maybe time for the pro gun control folks to SET THE AGENDA. They need to start forcing the Liberals to explain to the public what they mean.

Lawful gun owners seem always to close the barn door after the horse has left, HOW COME?

Its time to buy TV time or media advertising space across the country with those simple questions.

[DanE]

Maybe time for the pro gun control folks to SET THE AGENDA. They need to start forcing the Liberals to explain to the public what they mean.

Lawful gun owners seem always to close the barn door after the horse has left, HOW COME?

Its time to buy TV time or media advertising space across the country with those simple questions.

you can only buy space if you meet the criteria of the news station. the Canadian legacy media won't allow for adds promoting non liberal agenda to be aired

[delmer]

If anyone forced the Liberals to define "assault-style",their gun control agenda would fall apart on them.

Someone really needs to press the Liberals to actually define what constitutes an "assault style weapon". As it stands now, it is just a generic term without specifics. It's akin to labelling some automobiles as "luxury cars".

[DanE]

Someone really needs to press the Liberals to actually define what constitutes an "assault style weapon". As it stands now, it is just a generic term without specifics. It's akin to labelling some automobiles as "luxury cars".

they have a hard enough time figuring out which washroom to use. to actually give a proper definition is asking a lot