-
December 18th, 2024, 06:51 AM
#11
Is it that drones have to be MAX so much from the operator,for civilian use?
I was told so ,and that the limit is 100m radius?
Not much.
-
December 18th, 2024 06:51 AM
# ADS
-
December 18th, 2024, 08:39 AM
#12

Originally Posted by
gbk
Is it that drones have to be MAX so much from the operator,for civilian use?
I was told so ,and that the limit is 100m radius?
Not much.
Max altitude is 120m(400ft) for basic licence.. horizontally is "must stay in line of sight"
-
December 18th, 2024, 06:33 PM
#13

Originally Posted by
newbiehunter
Max altitude is 120m(400ft) for basic licence.. horizontally is "must stay in line of sight"
I'm thinking no licence or registration would be required for that Mini-2, as it's way under the 340 gram limit. You only need to register and get the licence if it's over 340 grams
-
December 18th, 2024, 09:01 PM
#14

Originally Posted by
Fenelon
I'm thinking no licence or registration would be required for that Mini-2, as it's way under the 340 gram limit. You only need to register and get the licence if it's over 340 grams
250gr
And regardless of license the same rules apply to basic/no license
-
December 19th, 2024, 08:00 AM
#15

Originally Posted by
trimmer21
My understanding is that drones fall under the same regulations as flying into a hunting camp...no hunting the area until the following day. My grandson uses his drone to aerial photograph and map properties for his Mother's real estate listings,but,they only use it for rural property. Flying over municipalities is "iffy" depending on bylaws. Federal flight rules governing drone flights were revamped last year. They're drone size and location specific.
That’s a law in Alaska but never heard of it in Ontario
-
December 19th, 2024, 09:13 AM
#16

Originally Posted by
FishHog
That’s a law in Alaska but never heard of it in Ontario
My thought too.
-
December 19th, 2024, 03:11 PM
#17

Originally Posted by
FishHog
That’s a law in Alaska but never heard of it in Ontario

Originally Posted by
werner.reiche
My thought too.
Are you referring to the first sentence? FWCA sect 24(3)
-
December 19th, 2024, 04:34 PM
#18

Originally Posted by
trimmer21
Are you referring to the first sentence? FWCA sect 24(3)
Well that says
“Aircraft
(3) A person shall not use an aircraft while hunting.”
that is very different than not hunting the same day you fly
-
December 19th, 2024, 09:30 PM
#19
The OOD Nov-Dec 2023 issue has an article about using drones for scouting and some of the legalities. From the article:
"The question of when a hunter can hunt after
flying into a location is common at these hunts.
There is no timeline limiting hunters from hunting the same day they fly in,
and the same applies for drones. Johnson said that the FWCA does not
prescribe a length of time between when wildlife is
spotted with a drone and when hunting may occur."
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy." Ernest Benn
-
December 20th, 2024, 01:18 AM
#20

Originally Posted by
delmer
The OOD Nov-Dec 2023 issue has an article about using drones for scouting and some of the legalities. From the article:
"The question of when a hunter can hunt after
flying into a location is common at these hunts.
There is no timeline limiting hunters from hunting the same day they fly in,
and the same applies for drones. Johnson said that the FWCA does not
prescribe a length of time between when wildlife is
spotted with a drone and when hunting may occur."
To me,that doesn't make a lot of sense. It's illegal to use any vehicle to hunt including aircraft and by extension drones. But,it's not illegal to fly over an area on the way into a camp,spot game on the way,then,land and hunt? Something doesn't make sense,here.