-
August 9th, 2016, 08:53 AM
#131
That was the first thing that jumped out at me. Those areas are full of farms where Coyotes are a huge issue with animal predation,unless the exemption for farmers for livestock protection is left in place. Trapping will take a huge hit,though. I'm sick of the OMNRF using these conflicting "studies" as justification for hunting bans of Algonguin Wolf/Red Wolf/Gray Wolf/Coyote in areas where the "science" couldn't offer definitive proof,only mere speculation. It's like they're pissing on your leg and telling you it's raining.
-
August 9th, 2016 08:53 AM
# ADS
-
August 9th, 2016, 09:51 AM
#132
Call me cynical, but my career in Bay Street taught me to take nothing at face value, question everything. I don't know and can't be bothered to cross reference. How much of that swath (which does oddly seem to want to move real close to 73/74) right into the alley.
fall within the Algonquin Land Claim area, which I think is somewhat more east, and thus not in it. May be nothing but I almost want to see a map with both areas overlaid/superimposed.
-
August 9th, 2016, 02:16 PM
#133
Originally Posted by
JBen
Call me cynical, but my career in Bay Street taught me to take nothing at face value, question everything. I don't know and can't be bothered to cross reference. How much of that swath (which does oddly seem to want to move real close to 73/74) right into the alley.
fall within the Algonquin Land Claim area, which I think is somewhat more east, and thus not in it. May be nothing but I almost want to see a map with both areas overlaid/superimposed.
From what I can see from the map and the knowledge I have of the ALC,none of the proposed additional areas fall within it.
Reply With Quote
