Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Closer to home....

  1. #31
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Barfly, my heart goes out to all of you.
    I'm sorry.
    No one should have been making assumptions at all.
    Truly, we should not have been discussing theories.
    We should let the police who are actively working this case do the talking.
    We need to be more careful of what we say because parts of this thread will hurt the owner if he sees it.
    Last edited by Noseyarentcha; November 28th, 2016 at 08:37 PM.
    My attitude towards you depends upon how you have treated me.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneBarfly View Post
    You are mistaken. We were all in the camp at the time, including the dog owner when two members went out to track the missing dog. Normally the owner and another member go out if a dog is not retrieved immediately. That day another member volunteered to search for the dog while the owner stayed in camp. Also, the media and or police got the type of collar wrong as we use only radiotelemetry Dog tracking collars, and not GPS.
    Barfly,
    Thank you for coming on board with some clarification. Truly a tragedy when this type of thing happens. One has to wonder who else was hunting in the area or....how well do you know your neighbouring camps/hunters
    Sorry to read/hear this!

  4. #33
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneBarfly View Post
    You are mistaken. We were all in the camp at the time, including the dog owner when two members went out to track the missing dog. Normally the owner and another member go out if a dog is not retrieved immediately. That day another member volunteered to search for the dog while the owner stayed in camp. Also, the media and or police got the type of collar wrong as we use only radiotelemetry Dog tracking collars, and not GPS.
    Sorry to hear about the dog so do you have any idea why this would happen.

    Welcome to the forum.
    Last edited by Gilroy; November 28th, 2016 at 04:02 PM.

  5. #34
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    Sorry to hear about the dog so do you have any idea why this would happen.

    Welcome to the forum.
    I don't know why this person decided that the dog had to be killed. Your guess is as good as mine. Could have been a "day hunter" who felt that his territory was being infringed, a psychopath, a poacher, who knows. I do hope that this person has a big mouth and is discovered.

  6. #35
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneBarfly View Post
    I am a member of this group and yes you can hunt in certain parts of the park under a special permit and a regulated hunting camp licence . The dog was a small beagle with a blaze orange radio collar, no mistaking it for anything else. The "friends" who found the dog only did so because it was still wearing the radio collar otherwise it wouldn't have been found. They were out tracking the radio signal with the intention of retrieving a live dog at the time.
    Sad set of circumstances indeed, hope they catch the dirt bag and throw the book at him.
    On another note, I thought that radio telemetry collars were also recently banned fro use in Canada by our friendly Canadian government.

  7. #36
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sidelock View Post
    Sad set of circumstances indeed, hope they catch the dirt bag and throw the book at him.
    On another note, I thought that radio telemetry collars were also recently banned fro use in Canada by our friendly Canadian government.
    Only some models because of the frequencies they use. Other are allowed because they operate on allowed frequencies. The banned collar in question can be made( at the factory or by a skilled tech) to operate on allowed frequencies. But the company would have to change the model name/number and have it approved by Industry Canada.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •