-
December 16th, 2016, 10:24 PM
#51

Originally Posted by
welsh
I was not aware you had inside knowledge of the investigation. You've examined the vehicle in question and taken a statement from the driver, I take it?
I'm in a great mood. Thanks for asking.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
That is correct. You have no idea what I am aware of.
I am not exactly sure what your idea of a great mood is. It appears that picking a fight makes you happy.
My contributions to this thread were about the lack of facts, lack of proof and placing blame without ANY evidence.
Haven't quite figured out what your contribution is disguised as.
Pick on someone else Welsh.
I am not in league with you 
I am surprised that you would step into a thread armed with nothing more than condescending arrogance and a desire to duke it out.
I thought you had more class than that.
Last edited by Noseyarentcha; December 16th, 2016 at 10:37 PM.
My attitude towards you depends upon how you have treated me.
-
December 16th, 2016 10:24 PM
# ADS
-
December 16th, 2016, 10:38 PM
#52
1. The fact that a person does not agree with you does not indicate he is "picking a fight."
2. Generally, the person who picks the fight is the one who responds with a personal attack, for example by suggesting the other is always in a bad mood or commenting on his "obvious arrogance."
3. The fact that there are few facts in a news report does not indicate the police have none.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
December 16th, 2016, 10:48 PM
#53
"Sorry in reality" you were picking a fight.
You were not "disagreeing" with me.
You were "calling me out."
You called.
I came.
...and now I am leaving this because I prefer to walk away from nonsense then to encourage more of the same.
Ta ta
My attitude towards you depends upon how you have treated me.
-
December 17th, 2016, 05:43 AM
#54
I always thought that two people could have completely opposite viewpoints/thoughts. Always thought and have lived (with only the occasional slip,am human after all) that the key to avoiding confrontation (aka fights) was.
Respecting the other persons point of view, whether one agree's with it not, know's it to be "true" or "not". A black and white case, which the world rarely is.
People can do that by.
A) Expressing and supporting their opinions, thoughts
B) Refraining from belittling the other person, or their viewpoint. Aka stick to what you "believe".
You can usually tell where things go off the rail by who is or who isn't "on the defensive". When someone has to "defend" their opinion.....
Many, many years ago an expert on such things taught me. If someone believes the world is flat, what's important is that "I" recognize that for them that viewpoint is "true". I have two choices.
A) I can belittle them and "go after" them, or their opinion
B) I can argue that it's round and stick to that. Aka make "my" case, or express "my" viewpoint.
Suggesting someone doesn't live in reality........Well yeah, that is going to get their back up, even if they are arguing the world is flat..
Last edited by JBen; December 17th, 2016 at 07:08 AM.
-
December 17th, 2016, 09:19 AM
#55
Weather it was a slug or not We do not know for sure
We do need to be careful with our guns to maintain public trust. There are some stupid hunters just look at the trespass link.
There are also responsible hunters. It may or may not have been a slug.
Conspiracy theories are just that theories and unproven theories at that
Contentiousness will get us no where. And unity will and discussion may be profitable if we are open to it
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
December 17th, 2016, 10:59 AM
#56
The only official report so far is this:
“They believe it’s going to be a shotgun slug,” OPP Const. Stacey Culbert said Friday of the fragment retrieved from the car.
(From the link posted by Ninepointer)
Let's leave it at that as this is getting silly.
Heeere fishy fishy fishy fishy! :fish: