Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: New Registry coming??

  1. #41
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canadaman30 View Post
    I don't see what good outdated info will do whatsoever
    One bill that requires PAL owners to respond to the letter that asks "Do you still own these?", which probably 60% have the same firearms is a quick start they can brag about. Now here is the important part, it fulfills their promise not to create a NEW registry. They hum and posture about safety and "dangers", mention UN on CBC and the Toronto star will follow etc. then (using their words, ignoring the 100,000,000 they will waste) "just turn on the old registry" (simplified for the CBC watchers) and spouting "that the Conservatives were so irresponsible.. blah blah blah..." Bob's your uncle and the Liebrals are the saviours of every sheeple in Canada.... and the effect to the deficit is minimal ... 35B, 36B .... what's the diff.....
    Last edited by mosquito; June 17th, 2017 at 02:52 PM.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #42
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    That bill would achieve nothing, because there is no LGR data to work from outside Quebec.

    Ignore Lilley. The copy that exists includes Quebec LGR data only. And it was retained because of a court order -- nobody is defying the SCC here. A copy of CFIS as at 3 Apr 2015 was retained under seal, and all LGR data was deleted from the system. This backup is the only known copy & its existence should surprise no one -- it has been discussed on this board in the past.

    Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
    "The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
    -- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)

  4. #43
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    If I remember correctly Que also had the largest percentage of non compliance with the gun registry ..making it even more useless.
    Flogging a long dead and rotting horse

  5. #44
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mosquito View Post
    One bill that requires PAL owners to respond to the letter that asks "Do you still own these?", which probably 60% have the same firearms is a quick start they can brag about. Now here is the important part, it fulfills their promise not to create a NEW registry. They hum and posture about safety and "dangers", mention UN on CBC and the Toronto star will follow etc. then (using their words, ignoring the 100,000,000 they will waste) "just turn on the old registry" (simplified for the CBC watchers) and spouting "that the Conservatives were so irresponsible.. blah blah blah..." Bob's your uncle and the Liebrals are the saviours of every sheeple in Canada.... and the effect to the deficit is minimal ... 35B, 36B .... what's the diff.....
    Unless one is served papers by the court, you don't have to accept unknown mail or answer an unknown phone number. Its simple non-compliance. IMO what ever provincial party in Quebec is pushing for it will proly see themselves kicking stones come election time.

  6. #45
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canadaman30 View Post
    Unless one is served papers by the court, you don't have to accept unknown mail or answer an unknown phone number. Its simple non-compliance. IMO what ever provincial party in Quebec is pushing for it will proly see themselves kicking stones come election time.
    It is Quebec we are talking about ... so we shall see...


    Send that letter with tracking and signature to anyone in the old registry and anyone with a PAL and put the RCMP, firearms laws and Liebral unicorn wishes and you can see what happens with the Census but probably worse if you ignore it.
    http://globalnews.ca/news/2689125/pr...-might-happen/
    1) Warning letter.
    2) a fine of up to $500, or up to three months in jail.


    But it is all speculation at this time based on repeated lies and extrapolation based on openly hostile and ridiculous ant-firearm statements like Liberal party resolution 42, Senate bill C-223 and Liberal Youth resolution 151 (if I remember the number right).

    https://www.ofah.org/downloads/PDF/N...s42Hotline.pdf
    Liberal Party of Canada’s Resolution #42
    WHEREAS automatic and semiautomatic weapons are illegal
    for hunting purposes; and
    WHEREAS automatic and semi automatic weapons do not
    support the hunting culture found in all parts of Canada;
    BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada urges the
    Government of Canada to support legislation to eliminate the
    personal use of automatic and semi automatic weapons.

    National Women’s Liberal Commission Liberal Party of Nova Scotia
    used for hunting.
    ...


    http://www.torontosun.com/2012/12/03...g-gun-registry
    Liberal leadership hopeful Justin Trudeau said Monday in Quebec he'd vote to restore the very same long-gun registry he called "a failure" Friday in Ontario.


    Justlied said after this he wouldn't create "a new registry" ...... I am just wondering if they are playing with words again like "tiny debt" ... $10B that they are now talking $38B for this year alone (more than the total he promised for all 4 years of his term) and he then said balanced in 2055 and now when asked yesterday said he won't speculate .... word games???? I wonder.... I mean after all Parliament and the Supreme court both said the data could be destroyed, the RCMP said it was and now a unicorn has brought a copy from the past??
    Last edited by mosquito; June 18th, 2017 at 04:04 PM.

  7. #46
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Most would and they registered last time.

    Quote Originally Posted by canadaman30 View Post
    Unless one is served papers by the court, you don't have to accept unknown mail or answer an unknown phone number. Its simple non-compliance. IMO what ever provincial party in Quebec is pushing for it will proly see themselves kicking stones come election time.
    "This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member

  8. #47
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canadaman30 View Post
    I don't see what good outdated info will do whatsoever
    Possibly,it may not be as outdated as one would think.......... if it was to still exist. We must remember that most hunters and competitors usually buy their firearms ONCE and not many switch them up once they own them. That would make the same firearms in the hands of the same people,therefore,the data would still be intact.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •