-
December 9th, 2017, 10:46 PM
#21

Originally Posted by
Fox
Ok, 7mm is .283, not .275, 270 is actually .277 but 270 is allowed in restricted WMUs.
The WMUs do not include all of SW Ontario, read the regulations to see which ones are included in this restriction.
Another point, this restriction is for hunting small game only, I do not know if there is but if there is a deer rifle hunt in a WMU that has a .275 restriction for small game that will not stop you from using anything on deer in that WMU unless there is a municipal bylaw.
I can tell you from experience, using your deer rifle to shoot long range and snap shoot groundhogs is very useful, 6.5x55mm at 200 yards on a groundhog means I will have no problem shooting that deer at that range and that same rifle at 10ft means there is a mess.
X2. I use Deer rifles every chance I get. It's sure great practice. If you can whack a GH at 200M,hitting a Deer or Moose is a piece of cake.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
December 9th, 2017 10:46 PM
# ADS
-
December 11th, 2017, 08:35 PM
#22
.243 restriction is Essex county
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
-
December 11th, 2017, 08:41 PM
#23
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
Rimfire905
For me I go by
Max calibre South of 89 is .275
I think closest you get to that is 7mm
Great coyote round.
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
7mm is to big for southern ontario
-
December 11th, 2017, 10:23 PM
#24

Originally Posted by
Rimfire905
For me I go by
Max calibre South of 89 is .275
I think closest you get to that is 7mm
Great coyote round.
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
Nope,the closest you get to that is .270Win. 7MM is either .284 or .286,not sure which exactly,but,at any rate,it's too heavy.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
December 12th, 2017, 07:28 AM
#25
Google says 7mm is 283 so you are correct re calibre too large.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
-
December 12th, 2017, 07:29 AM
#26
Fox laid it out a few posts up
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
-
December 12th, 2017, 08:29 AM
#27

Originally Posted by
Rimfire905
.243 restriction is Essex county
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
Where have you found this restriction or is this just something someone said?
I remember being told it was illegal to use anything smaller than .243 or FMJ bullets when hunting big game and also that FMJ bullets were illegal in Canada, both BS.
-
December 12th, 2017, 09:28 AM
#28
Has too much time on their hands
This thread reminds me of an Abbot and Costello act. Who's on first. lol
-
December 12th, 2017, 11:08 AM
#29

Originally Posted by
Fox
Where have you found this restriction or is this just something someone said?
I remember being told it was illegal to use anything smaller than .243 or FMJ bullets when hunting big game and also that FMJ bullets were illegal in Canada, both BS.
Here ya go !! See “Permitted Firearm”......
https://www.essex.ca/en/townhall/res...w_1070_acc.pdf
-
December 12th, 2017, 12:57 PM
#30

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Crazy, so you cannot sight in your rifle on your own property if it is above .243, so much for a 25-06 for coyotes down in Essex.
I contacted my by-law department before buying just to make sure.