Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: B.C. is ending the grizzly bear hunt

  1. #1
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default B.C. is ending the grizzly bear hunt


  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #2
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Natives will continue to kill grizzlies!

  4. #3
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Ended because it was socially unacceptable!!! This sets a very dangerous precedent!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #4
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigTurk View Post
    Ended because it was socially unacceptable!!! This sets a very dangerous precedent!
    Ended as a result of a few idiot hunters posting a video of the nasty shooting of a grizzly as it rolled down the side of a mountain. Once the public saw that, you knew there would be ramifications.

  6. #5
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Another reason is they were shot for the fur (trophy hunt) and left the carcasses to rot.

  7. #6
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bush24 View Post
    Natives will continue to kill grizzlies!
    and anything else the please...


    ...this is a bunch of BS...good on the politicians that stuck up for hunters rights at least there is still a dog in the fight even if loosing.

  8. #7
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Banning one set of hunters but allowing another set of hunters to continue is no longer acceptable. It's time for 1 set of rules based on data and science.

  9. #8
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mpsmyth6 View Post
    Banning one set of hunters but allowing another set of hunters to continue is no longer acceptable.
    Banning one set of hunters (sport hunting) but allowing another set of hunters (sustenance hunting) to continue is no longer acceptable...Really ??? How do you figure on gaining political support to block sustenance hunting by indigenous groups, presently covered under treaty rights ?

  10. #9
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    Banning one set of hunters (sport hunting) but allowing another set of hunters (sustenance hunting) to continue is no longer acceptable...Really ??? How do you figure on gaining political support to block sustenance hunting by indigenous groups, presently covered under treaty rights ?
    If hunting bears is wrong, then it's wrong for all, not just a select group because people don't like the politics of it. Ban bear hunting if their numbers do not allow it to continue, or just apply the same rules to all other hunting, by making it mandatory to bring out the meat and making it illegal to allow the meat to spoil. People love to bow down to FN hunters, but it's time for 1 set of rules for all of us, and make sure those FN hunters are not guiding or allowing meat to spoil as well, because yes they sport hunt too.

  11. #10
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Our current governments at ALL levels run like scared rats whenever the Indian card is played

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •