-
January 19th, 2018, 05:18 PM
#41
GUILTY as charged! Now,let's see what sentence he gets. My bet---$50 fine and a "don't do it again".
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
January 19th, 2018 05:18 PM
# ADS
-
January 19th, 2018, 07:11 PM
#42
Originally Posted by
trimmer21
GUILTY as charged! Now,let's see what sentence he gets. My bet---$50 fine and a "don't do it again".
Whatever the sentence is, it won't leave much of a mark. He took one for the team. He will be made whole by the liberal party.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
January 19th, 2018, 07:59 PM
#43
Has too much time on their hands
Originally Posted by
terrym
Whatever the sentence is, it won't leave much of a mark. He took one for the team. He will be made whole by the liberal party.
I love how Brian Lilley points out that it was the Liberal's party he belonged to, he will get a $100 fine and a $150,000/yr job after the election probably.
https://www.facebook.com/brianlilley...3485364051845/
-
January 20th, 2018, 10:06 AM
#44
Isn't it interesting how our resident liberal apologist is being so quiet about this "unfortunate" bump in the road for Wynnes reelection?
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
January 20th, 2018, 11:31 AM
#45
Originally Posted by
terrym
Isn't it interesting how our resident liberal apologist is being so quiet about this "unfortunate" bump in the road for Wynnes reelection?
Which one?
-
January 20th, 2018, 07:17 PM
#46
Originally Posted by
terrym
Isn't it interesting how our resident liberal apologist is being so quiet about this "unfortunate" bump in the road for Wynnes reelection?
Why would anyone participate in a forum, where because of a difference in political viewpoints ,some feel that kicking someone in the nuts is appropriate behaviour? The liberals will form a minority government after the next provincial election.
Last edited by fishermccann; January 20th, 2018 at 07:19 PM.
-
January 21st, 2018, 01:54 AM
#47
You may be right. God I hope not but I know how crooked they are and would never turn my back on a liberal. I don't recall threatening to kick anybody in the nuts?
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
January 21st, 2018, 08:14 AM
#48
Not you ,but a couple of others did. So much for a civil discussion. If everyone agrees and is stroking each others egos, it is known as a circle jerk, and you are welcome to it.
-
January 21st, 2018, 09:57 AM
#49
Oh my. Little bitter about losing the email destruction case ehh? Better try and build up a thicker skin. She's standing knee deep in her own poop.
Last edited by terrym; January 21st, 2018 at 09:59 AM.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
January 21st, 2018, 10:40 AM
#50
Not at all , she did nothing wrong , no charges against her, and it will have little affect on the outcome of the election. Is that your usual reply, when someone verbally threatens you with physical harm because of your opinion, get thicker skin? I would think that the change should be made by those uttering the threats, not those receiving them. I wonder how that would play out in court. 'Yes your honour, I do realize that I threatened the other man , but I think he should grow thicker skin.' How would that defence result in more time or monetary punishment? Lol.
Last edited by fishermccann; January 21st, 2018 at 11:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
