Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 42

Thread: Any Libertarian Party Members Here?

  1. #31
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    On the subject of libertarianism and other parties, here's an excerpt (33:05) from an interesting interview with Dr. Mike Munger, professor of political science & economics at Duke University, writer, and 2008 Libertarian candidate for Governor of North Carolina.

    Dave Rubin - political commentator, satirist, and talk show host

    What do you think is the reason that the Libertarians haven't done more at the State level? When people talk about the Libertarians, they go 'well Gary Johnson' or whatever it is. And yes there is Rand Paul, but technically he's a Republican. There's Justin Amash. there's a couple people, but why haven't they done more just on the local leve? This seems like a major opening for them.

    Dr. Mike Munger - professor of political science & economics at Duke University, writer, and 2008 Libertarian candidate for Governor of North Carolina

    Coming over here, I was promising myself I wasn't going to answer this question, but what the heck. I'll say, here's what happens at Libertarian meetings. The first one, twenty or thirty people show up and they're all enthusiastic. and at the second meeting, ten people show up, and the ten say 'I'm really glad those others didn't come back. They weren't real Libertarians,' because what they're mainly concerned about is checking each other's papers. So you can tell if it's a real Libertarian meeting by how long is it before there's an argument about whether individuals should be able to own nuclear weapons.

    Nobody cares about that. When I was running for Governor, people would say 'Would you end the Fed?' I'm running for Governor, actually. This is not... 'Yeah, but I wanna know.' So what we really care about is ideological purity, because if you cared about actualy policy or winning, you would suck it up and be a Democrat o Republican.

    So the problem that we have as Libertarians is, I don't think people conceive themselves as being part of a political process. They think of themselves as Oh Trey, as being outside and truth tellers -- the keepers of a last flickering remnant of truth. And that's just not a very effective political strategy.

    DR

    That's interesting because to me -- after doing this show for about two years and having a lot of classical liberals on, a lot of libertarians and I've had progressives and conservatives and everything -- basically, the difference that I see between classical liberals and libertarians is a little more realistic utility for the State. So when someone comes in with that question and says to you, 'Well are you going to get rid of the Fed? You've got money for Governor.' That's a really high-level philosophical thing that, to me, it's just a more realistic approach to how to change things. Do you think that's a fair assessment?

    MM

    Yes. And I've made a distinction in a couple of things that I've written between Directionalist and Destinationist Libertarians. Destinationist Libertarians have a particular Libertopia in mind, and anything that's not like that is out. Directionalists would want to say, 'are there policies that we could choose that would be cheaper, lower deficits, lower the power of the State and increase personal responsibility and liberty?' So an example would be, when I was running for Governor, my educational platform was vouchers. And a lot of people -- means-tested vouchers -- so the poorest forty percent would get more school choice. Many of the wealthy have it now. Let's have more school choice for the very poor. And a lot of people on the Left were kind of interested in that. There's a lot of African-American citizens that are desperate to get their children into better schools.

    Libertarians almost without exception said 'oh no, the State would be involved in that'. The only acceptable Libertarian policy is the immediate elimination of all taxes.

    DR

    Right. Again, this is the part that is not the realistic part.

    MM

    Because they're Destinationists. So the Destinationists are always going to be there. Libertarians, if they're going to have any success, are going to have to appeal to the Directionalists in both parties that say 'look, the government has too many powers'. We may disagree about how far back we want to move it, but let's move the train in the other direction. We're going the wrong way. I think there's a consensus. We should move it back. Where we get off the train, that's a different question. But let's change the direction.
    youtu.be/-FlQ1iDZxnE

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    There is a distinct difference between the agenda in the USA and Canada when it come to Libertarians. Americans have many more inherent rights then Canadians do. We used to have them, we are trying to get back some of those basic rights, as part of our platform. For the Ontario Libertarian Party here is the link to our principles.

    https://www.libertarian.on.ca/conten...and-principles

    STATEMENT OF ULTIMATE GOALS

    A. Libertarian Statement of Principles

    We, the members of the Ontario Libertarian Party, support the following principles:
    1.Each individual has the right to his or her own life, and this right is the source of all other rights.
    2.Property rights are essential to the maintenance of those rights.
    3.In order that these rights be respected, it is essential that no individual or group initiate the use of force or fraud against any other.
    4.In order to bar the use of force or fraud from social relationships and to place the use of retaliatory force under objective control, human society requires an institution charged with the task of protecting individual rights under an objective code of rules. This is the basic task, and the only moral justification for, government.
    5.The only proper functions of government, whose powers must be constitutionally limited are: •settling, according to objective laws, disputes among individuals, where private, voluntary arbitration has failed;
    •providing protection from criminals;
    •providing protection from foreign invaders.

    6.As a consequence of all the above, every individual -- as long as he or she respects the rights of others -- has the right to live as he or she alone sees fit, as a free trader on a free market.
    Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party

  4. #33
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    First off, owning ones self rights and property rights are the first steps to achieving this goal.

    Our platform on property rights will remove the power of OMB, MPAC and Conservation Authorities to ensure the homeowners and landowners have first right of refusal to enter into or onto peoples private property, unless invited or with a court order

    https://www.libertarian.on.ca/platfo...roperty-rights

    The Ontario Libertarian Party will say loud and clear - "Back Off Government"!
    Here's how:
    •Government agents will have no special privilege under the Ontario Trespass Act
    •Conservation Authorities and any other Department or Agency will have no jurisdiction over privately owned property. What this means for instance is the operator of a bar or restaurant can allow smoking on the premises without Government interference so long as the property owner is in agreement.
    •The Ontario Building Code Act will be amended so that it does not apply on a mandatory basis. Property owners can use the Code as guidance if they like. There will be no restrictions on off-grid solar installations.
    •Municipal Bylaw inspectors will have no right of entry or inspection uninvited without a judge's order.
    •Reduce the Ontario Land Transfer Tax to be a flat fee of $275 instead of the current fee that is based on the property value.

    That is how we will say loud and clear "Back Off Government"!
    Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party

  5. #34
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    If you are further interested the rest of the Platform links are here.

    I should note: Our Official Platform has been released Since June 2017... It is not changing, however, it is nice to see the current PC Leaders taking our platform points.

    https://www.libertarian.on.ca/platform/platform2018
    Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party

  6. #35
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Those points are exactly why the libertarians have never received more than 0.25%, (1 out of 400), of the vote, less than a quarter of 1% of people agree with their-your stance. It might make you feel good about running alterative policies to the mainstream parties, but 99.75% of the voters think you are nuts. Sorry, I did not mean pass judgement on your parties intellect, 99.75 of the voters do not agree with you.
    Last edited by fishermccann; March 2nd, 2018 at 09:22 AM.

  7. #36
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Well...I guess we will just have to wait until June 8th in Ontario to see if we improve those results. By all of our metrics, we are growing in leaps and bounds in the popular choice.
    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Those points are exactly why the libertarians have never received more than 0.25%, (1 out of 400), of the vote, less than a quarter of 1% of people agree with their-your stance. It might make you feel good about running alterative policies to the mainstream parties, but 99.75% of the voters think you are nuts. Sorry, I did not mean pass judgement on your parties intellect, 99.75 of the voters do not agree with you.
    Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party

  8. #37
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    A growth in leaps and bounds for your party would be a couple dozen more people. Good luck.

  9. #38
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by line052 View Post
    Well...I guess we will just have to wait until June 8th in Ontario to see if we improve those results. By all of our metrics, we are growing in leaps and bounds in the popular choice.
    I find that hard to believe and have not come across anyone going over to the Libertarian party. However I have come across a few going over to the Trillium party. I just checked the Libertarian Party website and found it to be very vague. I tried to find a map of local Libertarian representatives in my neck of the woods and could'nt find anything. I went over to the Trillium party website and immediately found a list of Ontario towns/cities with Trillium party representatives. The Trillium website contained more information and more professional. The Libertarian website seemed as if a grade 5 had done it as a class project.
    Last edited by yellow dog; March 2nd, 2018 at 04:36 PM. Reason: T

  10. #39
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by line052 View Post
    First off, owning ones self rights and property rights are the first steps to achieving this goal.

    Our platform on property rights will remove the power of OMB, MPAC and Conservation Authorities to ensure the homeowners and landowners have first right of refusal to enter into or onto peoples private property, unless invited or with a court order

    https://www.libertarian.on.ca/platfo...roperty-rights

    Conservation Authorities and any other Department or Agency will have no jurisdiction over privately owned property. What this means for instance is the operator of a bar or restaurant can allow smoking on the premises without Government interference so long as the property owner is in agreement.
    As a conservationist and as the spouse of a resource conservation specialist for a local CA, I have a problem with this part of the platform. There's a reason CA's exist and operate. People like to on them. I have the impression these people are misguided, or ignorant to what a CA's mandate is. If you're an outdoorsman and claim to care about the lands and waters you and other outdoorsmen enjoy, I would hope that you care enough to allow CA's to do what they're mandated to do.

    That is how we will say loud and clear "Back Off Government"!
    And when the floodwaters come, what then? Fend for yourself? Good luck.
    Last edited by awndray; March 2nd, 2018 at 03:57 PM.

  11. #40
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Find out " How Much of a Libertarian You Are, by taking this short quiz "

    https://www.theadvocates.org/results/right?x=30&y=70

    I find that I am not, I am " Right Conservative ".

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •