RCMP charge Okotoks homeowner after shots fired

[welsh]

Quite apart from Rick's point, you can't identify people from photos unless you have something to compare to. It's generally not going to help.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

[MikePal]

Hopefully his legal team get it sorted out for him?

Some precedences have been thru the courts...the example in the article (previously linked), the courts reduce the ordinal sentence to 11 months and he killed the trespasser...

Soon, a physical confrontation ensued between the interloper, John Ward, and the homeowner, who extricated himself from the fight long enough to run off and grab his rifle. He returned, firing two shots into Mr. Ward, killing him on the spot.

Mr. Nally would be charged with murder and manslaughter. He’d beat the murder charge but would get six years for manslaughter. Eleven months later, however, he would win his freedom, after an appeal and a retrial – based on precisely the same facts set out in the original trial.

Thank God some judges understand the intent of the law and can adjust the charge/sentence to reflect common sense.

[rick_iles]

Quite apart from Rick's point, you can't identify people from photos unless you have something to compare to. It's generally not going to help.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

A lot of criminals are identified by the police by posting good pics to social media. Happens all the time. The issue is getting quality photos.

[Bushmoose]

Quite apart from Rick's point, you can't identify people from photos unless you have something to compare to. It's generally not going to help.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

I'm not exactly sure what you mean? However, I do recall reading something about photo's not being permitted and used as evidence. Something to the effect of them not being proof enough due to chain of evidence? Or lack thereof?

[welsh]

A lot of criminals are identified by the police by posting good pics to social media. Happens all the time. The issue is getting quality photos.

But a lot are not. I can tell you the cameras on my property have never identified anyone, even with clear faces.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

[welsh]

I'm not exactly sure what you mean?

If you don't have a person who recognizes the photo or another, identified photo, you have no way of knowing who that person is.



Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

[Bushmoose]

If you don't have a person who recognizes the photo or another, identified photo, you have no way of knowing who that person is.



Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Granted, but if that person is recognized, and later found, can the image be used as evidence against them?

[welsh]

Some precedences have been thru the courts...the example in the article (previously linked), the courts reduce the ordinal sentence to 11 months and he killed the trespasser...



Thank God some judges understand the intent of the law and can adjust the charge/sentence to reflect common sense.

Except that it's not a precedent because it happened in IRELAND, and here in Canada our courts apply Canadian law.

I'm amazed how quickly people jump to defend this guy when nobody knows the facts.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

[rick_iles]

Granted, but if that person is recognized, and later found, can the image be used as evidence against them?

Definitely...

[Bushmoose]

Definitely...

Thanks Rick!