Gun Ban Ruled Out!

[terrym]

Multiple murder in Penticton in the news. Trudough will dance on their graves to salvage some votes.

[Badenoch]

Car and vans to run over people, fertilizer and fuel to bomb, passenger jets to mass kill, and the list gos on, what is your point?... Should we ban vehicals and jets and fuel??????

Greater good versus greater risk. The "good" from vehicles, jets, the fuel that powers them and fertilizer for efficient food production is outweighed by the potential risk. The "good" of civilian assault rifles and handguns in Canada where they are already heavily restricted and simply range toys for the most part is far less than the potential risk.

[GW11]

Greater good versus greater risk. The "good" from vehicles, jets, the fuel that powers them and fertilizer for efficient food production is outweighed by the potential risk. The "good" of civilian assault rifles and handguns in Canada where they are already heavily restricted and simply range toys for the most part is far less than the potential risk.

Will you expect the sport shooting community to have your back when "high powered sniper rifles" are next on the ban list or will you still be preaching about the "greater good"?

Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk

[trimmer21]

Greater good versus greater risk. The "good" from vehicles, jets, the fuel that powers them and fertilizer for efficient food production is outweighed by the potential risk. The "good" of civilian assault rifles and handguns in Canada where they are already heavily restricted and simply range toys for the most part is far less than the potential risk.

That's right,they're far less than the potential risk,already heavily restricted,so,why bother with further restrictions? Would it make something that's already illegal,more illegal? That makes no sense whatsoever and while we're at it,your term of "civilian assault rifles" is flat-out BS.

[Snowwalker]

We could just ban reproduction of Liberals..........

You can't ban a mental illness. You can only try to find ways to treat it, or remove it's victims from the population.

[Snowwalker]

Last time I checked no one used any of the above to slaughter people in a house of worship, gun down diners or kill police officers.

You standard was ".......has killed a man". Everything I listed has killed a man, as well as women, boys and girls.

[terrym]

Confiscating firearms from licensed and responsible owners won’t change crime stats. In fact it could make them worse. If it truly was about safety then alcohol should be banned. There is no biological reason to consume alcohol. It destroys far more lives and kills way more than guns. It’s political. Nothing else.

[canadaman30]

Greater good versus greater risk. The "good" from vehicles, jets, the fuel that powers them and fertilizer for efficient food production is outweighed by the potential risk. The "good" of civilian assault rifles and handguns in Canada where they are already heavily restricted and simply range toys for the most part is far less than the potential risk.

What a load of crap. So what is the greater good of alcohol that's kills so many people?.. the goods must outweigh the risks a you claim..

Sorry Terrym, you beat me to it...lol

[Snowwalker]

201926de255f326cde8d3a202deac2c3.jpg
Well said.

[Badenoch]

Will you expect the sport shooting community to have your back when "high powered sniper rifles" are next on the ban list or will you still be preaching about the "greater good"?

Don't expect it, don't need it and don't want it.