Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: FBI releases 'Bigfoot' documents from 1970s

  1. #1
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default FBI releases 'Bigfoot' documents from 1970s



    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-releases-bigfoot-documents-1970s-n1014346



    you guys believe in big foot?

    personally.

    i think with all the sightings from hunters, i dont understand why someone doesn't just blast one. LOL.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #2
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    17458140_1305792569499928_7711102703163499119_n.jpg

    The best Bigfoot defense is a camera.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  4. #3
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Until they have a body, it's just a myth.

  5. #4
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    With the amount of wilderness in Canada it is possible to have an animal that you just see glimpses of. One thing that is hard to dispel is the ancient art and stories by native cultures, that does not mean it is not something made up to scare kids and keep them out of the woods but so many cultures with no access to one another describing almost identical things at least builds up the possibility.

    I have not seen one but I have experienced a lot of weird things in the bush and felt that 6th sense of being watched more than once. Nothing would surprise me in the bush.

  6. #5
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canadaman30 View Post
    Until they have a body, it's just a myth.
    Not according to my buddy.....he said he was married to one !!

  7. #6
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Many places have passed laws making it illegal to shot one.
    I can see the laws to DISCOURAGE masses of people from swarming the woods after a sighting, but the laws make shooting one equal to murder.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  8. #7
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowwalker View Post
    Many places have passed laws making it illegal to shot one.
    I can see the laws to DISCOURAGE masses of people from swarming the woods after a sighting, but the laws make shooting one equal to murder.
    That sounds like a PETA induced fairy tale. It's "grain-of-salt" time.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  9. #8
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    That sounds like a PETA induced fairy tale. It's "grain-of-salt" time.
    BC, Washington State, Oregon, and I think California all have laws so it' not fairy tale.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  10. #9
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowwalker View Post
    BC, Washington State, Oregon, and I think California all have laws so it' not fairy tale.
    BC - nope - common myth
    Washington - $1000 fine
    California/Oregon - nope, although the way their wildlife laws are written it would be illegal as anything not listed with a season is considered verboten - but no specific law just a general law that applies to all unlisted wildlife.
    The wilderness is not a stadium where I satisfy my ambition to achieve, it is the cathedral where I worship.

  11. #10
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Species8472 View Post
    BC - nope - common myth
    Washington - $1000 fine
    California/Oregon - nope, although the way their wildlife laws are written it would be illegal as anything not listed with a season is considered verboten - but no specific law just a general law that applies to all unlisted wildlife.
    You may want to look closer at BC. Down around Hope I think. City Ordinance type stuff.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •