Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 71

Thread: Ontario Proposes a New and Improved Moose Management Program

  1. #61
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Kavanagh View Post
    I know I'm gonna get bashed here, but no one will address one of the real problems; native poaching. Three years ago they took 21 moose out of our area on snow machines in mid-winter. Yeah it's their right but that's just a BS statement. One of them told my buddy when confronted on the logging road that they'd "rather kill them all off than leave them for the likes of him (white) to be able to hunt them". They were even holding up the logging trucks with all the moose they killed. Nobody will ever do anything about that problem! Just saying.
    Feel good knowing your hard earned tax dollars are paying for their snow machines guns and bullets to waste those moose? We all support them and their rights..

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #62
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The next few years will be interesting to see how this pans out. More could be done but its a start at least.

  4. #63
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Kavanagh View Post
    I know I'm gonna get bashed here, but no one will address one of the real problems; native poaching. Three years ago they took 21 moose out of our area on snow machines in mid-winter. Yeah it's their right but that's just a BS statement. One of them told my buddy when confronted on the logging road that they'd "rather kill them all off than leave them for the likes of him (white) to be able to hunt them". They were even holding up the logging trucks with all the moose they killed. Nobody will ever do anything about that problem! Just saying.
    We cannot do anything about the native hunt and poachers, all that we can control is the amount that non-native hunters take out of the population and no matter what people say about the natives, the bears and the wolves, those animals will still be taken by those sources and the only limiting factor is non-native hunters.

  5. #64
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fox View Post
    We cannot do anything about the native hunt and poachers, all that we can control is the amount that non-native hunters take out of the population and no matter what people say about the natives, the bears and the wolves, those animals will still be taken by those sources and the only limiting factor is non-native hunters.
    Well, the bears and wolves have been around with the moose for 10,000 years. It's the elephant in the room that everyone is afraid to deal with which is going to help decimate moose hunting as we know it.

  6. #65
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    If the government of the day, any day, goes to court over native rights, native rights win every time. Why? Because they have the piece of paper (contract), that was signed many generations ago by a lawful government. If courts upheld all of the native claims, they WOULD own a large part of the country. When does a contract, a signed legal document, between parties, no longer apply? When one party does not want it to? When it is inconvenient? What are natives doing when they unnecessarily kill animals because they can? As my mother would say, 'They are cutting off their nose, to spite their face'.

  7. #66
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    If the government of the day, any day, goes to court over native rights, native rights win every time. Why? Because they have the piece of paper (contract), that was signed many generations ago by a lawful government. If courts upheld all of the native claims, they WOULD own a large part of the country. When does a contract, a signed legal document, between parties, no longer apply? When one party does not want it to? When it is inconvenient? What are natives doing when they unnecessarily kill animals because they can? As my mother would say, 'They are cutting off their nose, to spite their face'.
    People who freeloadand get a free ride through life respect very little. Why would they care if they don't have to work for anything?

  8. #67
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Agreed....... but their mind set 'might be', mind you I say 'might be'...... Why work for it, I own it. Or , they view it as rent, for us to live in their house.
    Last edited by fishermccann; August 21st, 2019 at 03:21 PM.

  9. #68
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Agreed....... but their mind set 'might be', mind you I say 'might be'...... Why work for it, I own it. Or , they view it as rent, for us to live in their house.
    And we can see how productive of a society that mindset creates, no matter what race of people......pathetic

  10. #69
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Agree again, everyone should have a purpose in life, it gives life meaning.

  11. #70
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    If the government of the day, any day, goes to court over native rights, native rights win every time. Why? Because they have the piece of paper (contract), that was signed many generations ago by a lawful government. If courts upheld all of the native claims, they WOULD own a large part of the country. When does a contract, a signed legal document, between parties, no longer apply? When one party does not want it to? When it is inconvenient? What are natives doing when they unnecessarily kill animals because they can? As my mother would say, 'They are cutting off their nose, to spite their face'.
    I agree with that theory...to a point. Courts always seem to uphold native claims which were agreed to by treaty being a signed contract between two parties,The Crown and First Nations. A learned legal mind who is a close friend opined among some peers that he's never seen nor read anywhere in jurisprudence of a law suit by First Nations over property ownership of Canada,outright. In the discussion,it was the general consensus that the reason for that was that a very strong argument could be advanced that First Nations people were merely occupiers of the land and couldn't legally lay claim as owners. The chance of a Court ruling against First Nations would set them back to square one and bring into question every treaty ever signed.
    If that may be the case,perhaps it's time to launch that law suit.
    Last edited by trimmer21; August 21st, 2019 at 06:25 PM.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •