Page 9 of 16 FirstFirst ... 2345678910111213141516 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 157

Thread: DU not supporting Gun owners

  1. #81
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    If you were to believe in Sprite's bravado Trimmer, if they lost all their guns and the ability to hunt waterfowl the DU membership will still continue with their conservation efforts. No more calendars, Gun raffles or hunting related activities..but they would still carry on for the love of the ducks.
    When the government makes cuts and stops financial support, where will they be then?

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #82
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fox View Post
    The rules have changed now, there are protections legally in place for wetlands..
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprite View Post
    I call baloney.
    Fox is right...The MNRF is now the responsible ministry for Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) program under the Planning Act.

    You may want to read up....

    https://www.ontario.ca/page/wetland-conservation

  4. #83
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canadaman30 View Post
    When the government makes cuts and stops financial support, where will they be then?
    Well they would be liars if they did not continue to make sure all those wetlands were bought and protected as they are now, I think they would have to give more money to offset the government loses.

  5. #84
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    Fox is right...The MNRF is now the responsible ministry for Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) program under the Planning Act.

    You may want to read up....

    https://www.ontario.ca/page/wetland-conservation
    No read up required, I work in the field.
    Last edited by Sprite; February 7th, 2020 at 01:46 PM.
    Krete

    Bills n' Thrills.

  6. #85
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    Semi-auto and pump shotguns can hold 5 or more rounds when the plug is removed. Anyone can remove a plug because the plugs aren't permanent. That puts them squarely in the sights of the anti gunners when unspecified blanket legislation is enacted by the usual "know nothings" as we saw in Australia and New Zealand.
    What was said was that every shotgun on the DU calendar would be banned which is complete bullsh-t. None of those guns will hold more than 5 with the plug removed unless a magazine extension is attached. All of the guns on the calendar can continue to be privately held in New Zealand and Australia although there are additional restrictions in Australia.

  7. #86
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    What was said was that every shotgun on the DU calendar would be banned which is complete bullsh-t. None of those guns will hold more than 5 with the plug removed unless a magazine extension is attached. All of the guns on the calendar can continue to be privately held in New Zealand and Australia although there are additional restrictions in Australia.
    Consider that a shotgun can hold five 3" shells without the plug, how many Federal shortys could you stuff in there?

    I'm not sold that anything is going to happen just yet because the loss in tax dollars would hurt. Libs are going to try and smooth talk their way into as many more votes as possible.

    Say the "black gun" ban gets passed, you think it stops there? The antis will pick away piece by piece every time there is a lib PM, like a gangrenous wound consuming a finger, limb then finally taking the body.

    Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
    How is it one careless cigarette can cause a forest fire, but it takes a whole box of matches to light a campfire?

  8. #87
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oaknut View Post
    Consider that a shotgun can hold five 3" shells without the plug, how many Federal shortys could you stuff in there?

    I'm not sold that anything is going to happen just yet because the loss in tax dollars would hurt. Libs are going to try and smooth talk their way into as many more votes as possible.

    Say the "black gun" ban gets passed, you think it stops there? The antis will pick away piece by piece every time there is a lib PM, like a gangrenous wound consuming a finger, limb then finally taking the body.
    Shotgun magazine capacity is determined by the shell for which it is chambered by both the RCMP and COs. There is not a single shotgun shown in the DU calendar that will hold five of the shells shells for which it was chambered in the magazine unless an extension is added.

    Your overwrought and juvenile comparison to gangrene notwithstanding, assault rifles were banned in the UK and Australia decades ago and gun owners in both countries can still own other guns so all this BS about all guns being banned next is just that. BS.

  9. #88
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    Shotgun magazine capacity is determined by the shell for which it is chambered by both the RCMP and COs. There is not a single shotgun shown in the DU calendar that will hold five of the shells shells for which it was chambered in the magazine unless an extension is added.

    Your overwrought and juvenile comparison to gangrene notwithstanding, assault rifles were banned in the UK and Australia decades ago and gun owners in both countries can still own other guns so all this BS about all guns being banned next is just that. BS.
    Overwrought and juvenile, for sure! [emoji106]

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/reason....england/%3famp


    Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
    How is it one careless cigarette can cause a forest fire, but it takes a whole box of matches to light a campfire?

  10. #89
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oaknut View Post
    Overwrought and juvenile, for sure! [emoji106]

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/reason....england/%3famp


    Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
    If you can't tell the difference between a knife and a gun perhaps your problem lies elsewhere.

  11. #90
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    If you can't tell the difference between a knife and a gun perhaps your problem lies elsewhere.
    Now now, let's not get grumpy.
    It's a pretty simple breadcrumb trail to follow.

    Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
    How is it one careless cigarette can cause a forest fire, but it takes a whole box of matches to light a campfire?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •