-
April 21st, 2020, 06:52 PM
#21
I was just trying to add to yours, I agree with you.

Originally Posted by
gbk
greatwhite-sorry,you misunderstood my post-
read the post i replied to: dont You think it is awesome,full of irony and really ingenious when 410001661 stated:
Let's ban-ILLEGAL guns!!!!



"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
April 21st, 2020 06:52 PM
# ADS
-
April 21st, 2020, 06:55 PM
#22
If I did I would be cited on here and yes there are several on here that have stated they want some guns banned because they don't think there is a need for them.
Also you have yourself in the past identified assault guns as guns that should be banned even thought we all know putting a military stock on a gun does not make it more dangerous.

Originally Posted by
Gilroy
Your post here is fully inaccurate and you cannot support it by a single past post.
Question. Show us posts where forum members on here said THEY WANT GUNS BANNED?
Show us posts on here where forum members have said if your put a military stock on a gun it becomes a powerful assault rifle?
Prime Minister Trudeau was asked questions by the Media about gun control in his daily briefing, he did not bring up the matter,we have a free press in this country who are allowed to ask questions.The fact that some of you guys posting right now are trying play politics with this tragedy is pretty low, as you put it.
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
April 21st, 2020, 07:42 PM
#23
Prime Minister Trudeau was asked questions by the Media about gun control in his daily briefing, he did not bring up the matter,we have a free press in this country who are allowed to ask questions.The fact that some of you guys posting right now are trying play politics with this tragedy is pretty low, as you put it.[/QUOTE]
I agree. However it has been reported that the 3 main anti gun lobbies sent a letter to Blair asking for swift action on gun control going so far as to suggest he put an immediate ban on the sale of "assault weapons". Unfortunately I can no longer find the link although I believe it was in the Sun. If this is true it is truly reprehensible but I agree we shouldn't be voicing our opposition right now either. TC
I found a link: https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...-shooting.html
Last edited by trky chsr; April 21st, 2020 at 07:50 PM.
-
April 21st, 2020, 07:48 PM
#24
No mention of firearms used at all.
In fact our state sponsored broadcaster is solely focused on the human story, and the fraudulent police equipment used. This is rare.
Again. Looks like spin, and damage control because unlike other "mass shootings" there is some element to this one that doesn't quite fit the narrative.
"Camo" is perfectly acceptable as a favorite colour.
Proud member - Delta Waterfowl, CSSA, and OFAH
-
April 21st, 2020, 08:04 PM
#25
Was reading on another post that there was an eye witness who saw this loser take the RCMP guns after dispatching the officer. You would have to assume he then used those stolen RCMP guns to go on his shooting rampage. If this is in fact the case, then you can see why the RCMP are pretty tight lipped about what gun was used.
-
April 21st, 2020, 08:12 PM
#26
Update.
Canadian media is being mum on things, but US and foreign media is reporting the following.
After the initial 2 murders, the RCMP constable rammed the suspects vehicle with her own. The suspect dragged her from her cruiser and shot her in the chest. Then relieved her of her service weapon ( and presumably any others in the vehicle, patrol carbine ( C8)?, shotgun?).
The suspect had a criminal record, and likely was not able to obtain firearms legally.
So this definitely doesn't fit the narrative that they're going for. RCMP response times, and their reluctance to send out a provincewide warning are also likely going to be under the microscope on this one.
There has already been one victims husband who is threatening to sue based on RCMP lack of response / inadequate response.
"Camo" is perfectly acceptable as a favorite colour.
Proud member - Delta Waterfowl, CSSA, and OFAH
-
April 21st, 2020, 08:16 PM
#27

Originally Posted by
greatwhite
If I did I would be cited on here and yes there are several on here that have stated they want some guns banned because they don't think there is a need for them.
Also you have yourself in the past identified assault guns as guns that should be banned even thought we all know putting a military stock on a gun does not make it more dangerous.
We are on a hunting forum so I figured it would be kinda hard for you to produce evidence for what you alleged. LOL
I have never identified a gun as "assault gun" it must be a new category you made up.Have I indicated in the past I don't care about weekend warriors playing with their AR 15,s , yes guilty as charged. Have I indicated I have no interest in them as they have no place in hunting,yes.Do I
care if they get banned,no.
-
April 21st, 2020, 08:27 PM
#28

Originally Posted by
trky chsr
Prime Minister Trudeau was asked questions by the Media about gun control in his daily briefing, he did not bring up the matter,we have a free press in this country who are allowed to ask questions.The fact that some of you guys posting right now are trying play politics with this tragedy is pretty low, as you put it.
I agree. However it has been reported that the 3 main anti gun lobbies sent a letter to Blair asking for swift action on gun control going so far as to suggest he put an immediate ban on the sale of "assault weapons". Unfortunately I can no longer find the link although I believe it was in the Sun. If this is true it is truly reprehensible but I agree we shouldn't be voicing our opposition right now either. TC
I found a link: https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...-shooting.html[/QUOTE]
None of these gun control groups should be making comment at this time,they are showing no empathy for the victim's of this tragedy.I think
everybody should take a deep breath until we get some FACTS.
-
April 21st, 2020, 08:35 PM
#29
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
Bluebulldog
Update.
Canadian media is being mum on things, but US and foreign media is reporting the following.
After the initial 2 murders, the RCMP constable rammed the suspects vehicle with her own. The suspect dragged her from her cruiser and shot her in the chest. Then relieved her of her service weapon ( and presumably any others in the vehicle, patrol carbine ( C8)?, shotgun?).
The suspect had a criminal record, and likely was not able to obtain firearms legally.
So this definitely doesn't fit the narrative that they're going for. RCMP response times, and their reluctance to send out a provincewide warning are also likely going to be under the microscope on this one.
There has already been one victims husband who is threatening to sue based on RCMP lack of response / inadequate response.
That sheds a bit of light on things. Thanks for the info.
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
"where a man feels at home, outside of where he's born, is where he's meant to go"
- Ernest Hemingway
-
April 21st, 2020, 08:49 PM
#30
Tru-dough and his feeble minded followers once again prove they are grave dancers. Nothing like a tragedy to push an agenda eh? If the truth is this madman actually used firearms taken from the RCMP officer then that doesn’t really fit the gun grabbers narrative does it? In the end the Bloc will support anything the Libranos do to hang on to their jobs and pensions so prepare to lose many if not all of your firearms. Covid will consume everything for a year at least but don’t kid yourself, the libs want to disarm law abiding gun owners. I expect an Australia type law as soon as they can table it.
Last edited by terrym; April 21st, 2020 at 09:04 PM.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.