Mandatory Masks

[Badenoch]

Especially, when the poll comes from liberal media like the Toronto star.

Read the article. The pollster is a long-time Conservative.

The anti-mask dunderheads need to understand that in Ontario they are a tiny, insignificant minority and when in indoor public places will either have to strap up or bugger off.

[canadaman30]

The anti-mask dunderheads need to understand that in Ontario they are a tiny, insignificant minority and when in indoor public places will either have to strap up or bugger off.

One size fits all..eh?
Attachment 40656
Attachment 40657

[gbk]

Read the article.

The anti-mask dunderheads need to understand ....

Badenoch-there is an old saying-just because one shouts his own points in an argument does not make his points more strong.

Name calling is becoming a trend here with our leftists friends,calling people dunderheads,dumbas...es,wacko's,you name it,easy to make the list longer ,just look up some old threads.........then pulling out swear words like-racist, homophob ,anti this -anti that etc,
All in overwhelming cases just to substantiate one's pints in a debate.

Is there a better way .............???
Or maybe it is not,so the only one way to try to bring thru points and potentially try to "win" an argument is by name calling.


Pathetic.

[Badenoch]

Badenoch-there is an old saying-just because one shouts his own points in an argument does not make his points more strong.

Name calling is becoming a trend here with our leftists friends,calling people dunderheads,dumbas...es,wacko's,you name it,easy to make the list longer ,just look up some old threads.........then pulling out swear words like-racist, homophob ,anti this -anti that etc,
All in overwhelming cases just to substantiate one's pints in a debate.

Is there a better way .............???
Or maybe it is not,so the only one way to try to bring thru points and potentially try to "win" an argument is by name calling.


Pathetic.

LOL. When the supporters of wearing masks are called "sheep" or referred to in other derogatory terms you have nothing to say. When the anti-mask mouth-breathers get a little in return you rise up on your high horse and start dishing out great heaping helpings of condescension. Weak.

[canadaman30]

LOL. When the supporters of wearing masks are called "sheep" or referred to in other derogatory terms you have nothing to say. When the anti-mask mouth-breathers get a little in return you rise up on your high horse and start dishing out great heaping helpings of condescension. Weak.

Who started the name calling on post#521? What's wrong, you can dish it out, but you cant take it in return eh?

Indeed Pathetic!

[Jakezilla]

The masks are not about safety if they were the WHO and other bodies/"authorities" would not have flip flopped on them. If it was about safety there would be standards for the masks not just any piece of cloth over your face. Anyone that believes there is science behind the mask issue needs to do some reading other than the headlines. I would say the masks are about control but that would give our leaders too much credit. We don't have leaders in this country anymore, they are followers getting advice from their medical advisors and they are failing to properly balance that advice against the advice of psychologists, economists etc. The singular focus of the governments approach to this should be disturbing to everyone. Many people are pro mask because the government / media have terrorized the population with their fear mongering and the masks help them deal with that fear. The Federal and provincial governments have passed the mask issue to the municipalities so that the can use bylaws instead of properly debated legislation. I doubt any mask legislation enacted outside of a declared emergency would hold up to a court challenge because there isn't enough evidence that they make a noticeable difference.

Masks are becoming a virtue signal and that's not good for anyone.

[canadaman30]

Exactly Jakezilla.

[gbk]

LOL. When the supporters of wearing masks are called "sheep" or referred to in other derogatory terms you have nothing to say. When the anti-mask mouth-breathers get a little in return you rise up on your high horse and start dishing out great heaping helpings of condescension. Weak.

My firend-lets do this your way:I am not sitting on high horse,contrary to You-who is taking every opportunity to show moral superiority.
As far as sitting on high horse for mask debate-you can do yourself a favor, not to be looking unaware-clueless or just ignorant.Way baaaack i made statement,that my take on the masks is simple:if that is what takes to get our normal life back,i am all for it,That is about Your theory of my high horse .
As far as sheep as a derogatory term concerned-as other mentioned ,You started name calling,do not expect anything less back........regardless,calling one sheep even by urban slang is a whole lot meeker,then dumba..ss,dudnerhead or wacko.
If you step down from your moral high horse,even You may realize that.

As far as"weak" concerned-i try to avoid shouting in people's faces,as much as i can,so calling me weak is a compliment.

LOL

[greatwhite]

Wow were at 53 pages. I should check what the record is.

[trimmer21]

Read the article. The pollster is a long-time Conservative.

The anti-mask dunderheads need to understand that in Ontario they are a tiny, insignificant minority and when in indoor public places will either have to strap up or bugger off.

Nonsense. It's published in The Star making it flat-out,Liberal leftist BS.