When will it end ,fights , burning vehicle's and building's

[MikePal]

The trains should have ran them over. The rest of them would think twice about blocking the railway. Our current government is to cowardly to do anything to stop them. Every dollar lost should have been taken from their handouts x10

The guys they caught on video trying to set the train on fire while it was moving should have been arrested and jailed....nary a word on that investigation, if any was even conducted. Does appear that the police turn a blind eye when crimes are committed by the protesters during these blockades.

[canadaman30]

The guys they caught on video trying to set the train on fire while it was moving should have been arrested and jailed....nary a word on that investigation, if any was even conducted. Does appear that the police turn a blind eye when crimes are committed by the protesters during these blockades.

I'd call it racist that if a group of white folk blocked the railway, they are arrested and charged accordingly. FN are exempt.....sad government we have.

[fishfood]

First off it's going to cost the commercial fisherman way more to fish way less during open seasons.
Catch restrictions and everyone non indigenous just gets burned . Happens all the time . Maybe it's time for a new treaty we are in 2020 not the 1900s .


What is a moderate living considered to be?

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[tkipfer]

Without accusing anyone here of anything in particular, those that have an opinion on how to best handle our relationship with the First Nations groups within Canada, have you actually read any of the treaties? Or, for that matter, any legitimate writings regarding the treaties?

Every time these conflicts arise there is an unlimited supply of opinions on what we should do, or what the various groups must want however I find sometimes find historical context and understanding missing from the discussions. I think, just maybe, that if all the sides involved in this current lobster dispute came into the situation with the intention to calmly sort things out we might actually get somewhere, and just MAYBE even set some sort of example of how to resolve these situations in the future. Because frankly, this is just the start of things.

For anyone interested, I recommend reading "On being here to stay" by Michael Asch. Its one of the few books i've come across regarding the treaties that provides a clear historical context (from BOTH sides of the treaties) and maybe gives us the best idea of what the treaties were really agreeing to without any obvious underlying dog in the fight.

Again, not accusing or implying anything regarding all the fine folks here. Just want to make sure we are coming into this with a little bit of reason. I think the state of things these days is a pretty solid example of where we get by only bringing emotions and baseless opinions to the conversation.

[MikePal]

I think the state of things these days is a pretty solid example of where we get by only bringing emotions and baseless opinions to the conversation.

In reviewing comments on Michael Asch's book I saw it quoted " Asch proposes a way forward based on respecting the “spirit and intent” of treaties negotiated at the time of Confederation," I think that should open up the discussion for both parties in those agreements. Was the "intent" of the treaties to have First Nations sucking at the the teat of Government to the tune of $Billions annually in perpetuity ?? Is holding today's Government financially responsible for the reconciliation of wrongs purported 100's of years ago the result of true wrongs or just greed ? How long do they expect to milk the past. ?

A lot of the discussions on here are hardly "baseless opinions"..there are opinions that a lot of Canadians have and feel the Government is not taking a hard enough line to rectify the animosity that the Indian Act has created with the Indigenous communities. We hear a lot about what they don't like..but there is little we hear about what our side don't like with the agreements.

ie: Back in 2012 the Government made it law that the Bands Councils had to provide financial audits of the money they received from the federal government for programs ...it was fought with tooth and nail by the Band councils who refused to abide by the law...yet it is painfully obvious, by living conditions on reserves, that the money was not spent to make their living conditions better.

As for the Lobster debacle, like the Moose, the Indigenous communities are using their "Treaty Rights" (written back in 1760 and not been updated to reflect the science we have today) to decimate the Lobsters and Moose. The fisheries are a livelihood that need to be managed by science...not treaty rights written 100's of years ago.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans in Canada only allows lobster fishing during specific seasons to coordinate with moulting schedules that make them vulnerable and easily killed, but Indigenous fishers say they have a right to fish when and where they want, as defined in the treaty.

[greatwhite]

Regardless of Government and the RCMP until the FN are also willing to change the Lobster Fishers will not stop.
The government says the stocks are steady the lobster fishers say they are down. These people know the sea better then the Government.
If they say stocks are down you can bet they are down.

A few weeks ago the chief said he had a solution that he felt was good for both sides, he said they should reduce the number of traps that the commercial people can use and increase the bands. Not sure if it was suppose to be funny, but I don't think the other side thought it was funny.

Also could be serious since the Mohawks from Quebec/Ontario are down there with rifles. If there is bloodshed it will be the FN and Government who caused it.

[fishermccann]

A treaty is a contract, signed by both the Bands and the Canadian government. One side cannot break a contract just because they want to. Try that with any other lawful agreement. They were given those contracts in exchange for land. Simple really, if we don't want to uphold the treaty, then give them back the land. Can't have it both ways. The way it stands now ,if the government won't give them the land, then we will pay them billions a year till we do. If the Bands would rather have the land than the money, what can you do , they have a legally binding contract.

[greatwhite]

There is a difference between feeding your family and selling at least to the best of my knowledge, but then what do I know I'm not a union boy.

A treaty is a contract, signed by both the Bands and the Canadian government. One side cannot break a contract just because they want to. Try that with any other lawful agreement. They were given those contracts in exchange for land. Simple really, if we don't want to uphold the treaty, then give them back the land. Can't have it both ways. The way it stands now ,if the government won't give them the land, then we will pay them billions a year till we do. If the Bands would rather have the land than the money, what can you do , they have a legally binding contract.

[410001661]

ie: Back in 2012 the Government made it law that the Bands Councils had to provide financial audits of the money they received from the federal government for programs ...it was fought with tooth and nail by the Band councils who refused to abide by the law...yet it is painfully obvious, by living conditions on reserves, that the money was not spent to make their living conditions better.

I always said the gov't should take the money they give FN Band Councils and distribute it directly to the people and then tell the Band Council it is up to them to collect their 'taxes' from their people.

The whole thing is organized crime IMHO.

[canadaman30]

A treaty is a contract, signed by both the Bands and the Canadian government. One side cannot break a contract just because they want to. Try that with any other lawful agreement. They were given those contracts in exchange for land. Simple really, if we don't want to uphold the treaty, then give them back the land. Can't have it both ways. The way it stands now ,if the government won't give them the land, then we will pay them billions a year till we do. If the Bands would rather have the land than the money, what can you do , they have a legally binding contract.

The problem is what ever is given to the fn is never enough, they always want more. They have all the luxuries of modern day, heat hydro, motorized, etc. Maybe they should be paying taxes for all the modern living luxuries they have. They no longer live in teepees and ride horses. When they don't get their way they commit criminal acts knowing they are exempt from prosecution. Does they indian act exempt them from committing criminal acts that cripple our economy? If not then why is it allowed to go unpunished?