Liberals' two-billion-trees promise to cost $2.78 billion more than planned

[fishermccann]

Your reply shows your comprehension skills, or lack there of...lol
Never did I say all gun owners are effected. I get it, thats how the left twists the truth though...

Post #37...... ALL Canadian gun owners....

[canadaman30]

Post #37...... ALL Canadian gun owners....

FInish the sentence I wrote, not just half of it. Then maybe you can grasp what was written.

[warpipe]

Does anyone really believe that the anti gun advocates will be happy with these bans and move on to something else? It may not affect some of you now but if you think as a gunowner this isn't your battle then the upcoming generation of hunters don't have a chance. Take off your tinfoil hat you say. People are being charged for being 10 minutes late getting home in curfew areas. Small business owners are being thrown in jail for trying to keep their businesses from going under. You're feet at the back of the boat may not be wet yet but the guys at the front are getting tired of bailing.

[Gilroy]

Your reply shows your comprehension skills, or lack there of...lol
Never did I say all gun owners are effected. I get it, thats how the left twists the truth though...

Well if we are giving English lessons today perhaps you should have wrote

ALL Canadian gun owners that are subject to THE gun ban.

[rick_iles]

Well if we are giving English lessons today perhaps you should have wrote

ALL Canadian gun owners that are subject to THE gun ban.

Perhaps you meant “ should have written”...not “should have wrote”......if you are giving English lessons..... just saying......!

[canadaman30]

Well if we are giving English lessons today perhaps you should have wrote

ALL Canadian gun owners that are subject to THE gun ban.

Perhaps learn how to read before commenting. Its really not hard to understand.
I know the truth is hard to accept about the rot at the top attacking law-abiding gun owners. Especially so when you support and vote for a government that classifies you, a licensed gun owner as a thug. Your fellow drug dealing bangers get more respect from trudeau than you. He would never classify gangsters as thugs as it would be hurtful, and degrading
Seems fitting..and full of truth..lol
Attachment 41397

[Gilroy]

Perhaps you meant “ should have written”...not “should have wrote”......if you are giving English lessons..... just saying......!

I stand corrected in my haste to have fun with Canadaman I wrote to fast.

[Gilroy]

Perhaps learn how to read before commenting. Its really not hard to understand.
I know the truth is hard to accept about the rot at the top attacking law-abiding gun owners. Especially so when you support and vote for a government that classifies you, a licensed gun owner as a thug. Your fellow drug dealing bangers get more respect from trudeau than you. He would never classify gangsters as thugs as it would be hurtful, and degrading
Seems fitting..and full of truth..lol
Attachment 41397

I have never heard of gun owners being referred to as thugs and what I find hurtful is your racially insensitive posts. Now go back to your room.

[Gilroy]

Does anyone really believe that the anti gun advocates will be happy with these bans and move on to something else? It may not affect some of you now but if you think as a gunowner this isn't your battle then the upcoming generation of hunters don't have a chance. Take off your tinfoil hat you say. People are being charged for being 10 minutes late getting home in curfew areas. Small business owners are being thrown in jail for trying to keep their businesses from going under. You're feet at the back of the boat may not be wet yet but the guys at the front are getting tired of bailing.

Why would you categorize this as a "anti gun advocates issue" there was an election promise prior to the election, the election was held ,the promises fulfilled on behalf of the electorate, end of story.

[Bushmoose]

I stand corrected in my haste to have fun with Canadaman I wrote to fast.

I believe the word "too" should have been used, instead of "to"?