Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 98

Thread: Another Nut Job

  1. #41
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onelessarrow View Post
    WTH are you talking about.
    The video is displaying a POS human that would rather hold a phone than check for vitals.
    Standing there gawking taking video is completely stupid but not the sign of some deep state conspiracy. When the shooting starts and you're in no position to stop it GTFO.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #42
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    So, ignore that there's no sign of gunshot trauma, no panic in anyone's face and some clown who happens to be just narrating an active shooting and nobody is paying attention to him. Lmao.
    Well I guess as long as your knowledge provider tells you to follow the script, you're good to go.
    Just so you know, there are millions around the world as we speak that can't understand how the sheep won't wake the puck up.
    Just saying!
    Either way, we'll see you at the finish line.

  4. #43
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    While sometimes we chafe under Canadian gun laws it is incidents like this that show their benefits.

    The difference is that here it is far more difficult for them to get deadly weapons than in America.
    How about Nova Scotia?

  5. #44
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gbk View Post
    How about Nova Scotia?
    The key word that I used twice in my post is "legally." The Nova Scotia shooter didn't just stroll into a gun store and buy an assault-style rifle. He had to have it smuggled in and then acquired the ammo illegally.

  6. #45
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoePa View Post
    Your talking mass shootings - what about the shootings that involve one or two people -
    Question,JoePa. Given the carnage of mass shootings,street murders and the current position on 2A that's become,quite clearly, completely untenable and defying all logic and common sense,at what point would you think Americans need to consider serious restrictions on firearm acquisition and ownership?
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  7. #46
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fox View Post
    Exactly, white men of means
    https://www.statista.com/statistics/...y-ethnicities/

    Almost identical
    Last edited by WillieBeno; March 24th, 2021 at 08:05 PM.

  8. #47
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    Question,JoePa. Given the carnage of mass shootings,street murders and the current position on 2A that's become,quite clearly, completely untenable and defying all logic and common sense,at what point would you think Americans need to consider serious restrictions on firearm acquisition and ownership?
    The second amendment isn't about firearm acquisition and ownership....it's about preventing tyranny.
    OFAH, CSSA, NFA

  9. #48
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Which Americans expect to mean armed to the teeth. The 2A also says

    A well regulated militia.

    Not.

  10. #49
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Lol I love how off track this has become [emoji23]

  11. #50
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    Question,JoePa. Given the carnage of mass shootings,street murders and the current position on 2A that's become,quite clearly, completely untenable and defying all logic and common sense,at what point would you think Americans need to consider serious restrictions on firearm acquisition and ownership?
    Serious restrictions on firearm acquisition and ownership? - only if the person is insane or a criminal with a record - only with the ability to have firearms can people protect their freedom - history has shown that the first thing any dictator or evil government -will do is confiscate guns and disarm the citizens - there are plenty of examples throughout history where the government enslaved its citizens because they didn't have the means to fight back - unfortunately that freedom has a price when someone uses a firearm to harm innocent people - I have in the past told of this incident - years ago at a local college a survivor of the holocaust gave a talk - after finishing he fielded questions from the audience - one individual ask him why the Jews didn't fight against the Nazis when they saw what was happening - the survivor's response - "with what they took all our guns" - our forefathers knew the value of citizens having the right to resist a evil government that's why we have the second amendment to our constitution - I think it is a God given right for one to be able to protect one's self and family from evil people - I feel so strong about this I would never give up that right - and remember one thing the first step to confiscation is registration - I hope that I answered your question - am a proud member of the NRA

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •