Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 53

Thread: The Calf moose discussion

  1. #1
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default The Calf moose discussion

    Read so much about how 40 percent or so calves don't make it to year one so shooting them doesn't effect the population,
    But how many of these 40 percent die well before the season from wolfs, bears and road kills. My guess is the majority that are going to die from nature do in the first couple months so the ones they are being harvested are the strong calves from the jean pool that have more of a fighting chance.
    Anyone have any proof behind my thoughts.
    No saying I'm right or wrong just curious,
    I personally don't see the need to shoot calves or cows with calves,
    Should be like spring bears illegal to shoot a sow with cubs or a cub with a sow.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #2
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Interesting hypothesis, and I too can't accept the sense (if any) behind the calf harvest. Let natures chips fall where they may but don't compound it is my opinion. However, those who's hackles get raised at any hint of restricting harvests will not agree.
    CCFR Member

  4. #3
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I was lucky enough to witness a cow moose pregnant, then missing the following week, then re-apreading with her calf the following week while turkey hunting this year.

    that changed my mind about calf hunting.

    But my understanding is that its the harsh winter that kills alot of calves. too short to get over snow, or reach food higher up, as a result they get weaker, and fall pray to predators is that I was told.

    calf hunting is just around, to give us a chance to hunt, there is not good reason other than not taking as much cows I believe.
    at the end, natural selection applies though. if a calf is gonna present itself to a hunter, then it probably would do same to bears or wolves .... lol
    CCFR, OFAH Member
    Its all about the Journey

  5. #4
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    IMHO, it’s better on the moose population to take calves, and leave breeding adults for recruitment. Our group has hunted in the NW for about 40 years. I think we have taken maybe 4 calves in all that time. I’ve always heard the presumption that a high percentage of calves don’t make it through the first winter. We do tend to see lots of yearling moose that have survived.
    Last edited by rick_iles; August 5th, 2021 at 12:04 PM.
    “If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
    -Winston Churchill

  6. #5
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    IMHO, it’s better on the moose population to take calves, and leave breeding adults for recruitment. Our group has hunted in the NW for about 40 years. I think we have taken maybe 4 calves in all that time. I’ve always heard the presumption that a high percentage of calves don’t make it through the first winter. We do tend to see lots of yearling moose that have survived.
    Personally,I won't shoot a calf and most of our crew are OK with it. There's a couple of guys that will take one and we're OK with that,too. We're big believers in the "different strokes for different folks" concept as long as it's legal. I could never wrap my head around the "40% won't survive,anyway" concept. If that's accurate,what sense does it make to add hunter harvest to further exacerbate the issue?

  7. #6
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    IMHO, it’s better on the moose population to take calves, and leave breeding adults for recruitment. Our group has hunted in the NW for about 40 years. I think we have taken maybe 4 calves in all that time. I’ve always heard the presumption that a high percentage of calves don’t make it through the first winter. We do tend to see lots of yearling moose that have survived.
    So you are for an open hunt for calves as we used to have?

    How do you replenish the adults then when they die of old age?

  8. #7
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    in my opinion all game that isnt at least a yearling shouldnt be harvested. (deer, moose bear)

    if the young ones are to die it should be by a predator or by natures course. again just my opinion though.

  9. #8
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    We drew 2 calf tags for the moose hunt this year. I've already told the group to do what you want, I'll be staying home until when and if I draw an adult tag. Doesn't bother me if they want to hunt calves. Personal choice.

  10. #9
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    Personally,I won't shoot a calf and most of our crew are OK with it. There's a couple of guys that will take one and we're OK with that,too. We're big believers in the "different strokes for different folks" concept as long as it's legal. I could never wrap my head around the "40% won't survive,anyway" concept. If that's accurate,what sense does it make to add hunter harvest to further exacerbate the issue?
    Hunters were never believed to add much to the overall impact. The idea was that if you shot a calf there was a reasonably good chance that you took one that wouldn't survive anyway. Pretty bad luck if hunters somehow shot all the calves that were likely to make it through the winter. The other part of it (as seen in the thread here) was that groups of hunters were unlikely to plan a moose hunt with only a calf tag. Most calf tags went unfilled. That being said, we usually averaged shooting a calf every other year or so.

    Personally I think it's one of those practices that might have made sense when it was put in place but it no longer works.

    Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
    "where a man feels at home, outside of where he's born, is where he's meant to go"
    ​- Ernest Hemingway

  11. #10
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW11 View Post
    Hunters were never believed to add much to the overall impact. The idea was that if you shot a calf there was a reasonably good chance that you took one that wouldn't survive anyway. Pretty bad luck if hunters somehow shot all the calves that were likely to make it through the winter. The other part of it (as seen in the thread here) was that groups of hunters were unlikely to plan a moose hunt with only a calf tag. Most calf tags went unfilled. That being said, we usually averaged shooting a calf every other year or so.

    Personally I think it's one of those practices that might have made sense when it was put in place but it no longer works.

    Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
    Those are my thoughts,too. At the outset,it seemed workable and logical,but,as time went on,adult tags were continually being cut back forcing hunters to become very adept at searching out and taking calves. That's where I fault the government. As soon as that became evident,OMNR should have moved quickly to curb it by stopping automatic calf tag sales and including them in the allocation process or removing calf tags completely. Instead,it became a cash grab adding to the problem. When we add everything together,climate change,Black Bear,Wolf and Coyote predation,the perfect storm was created. Now,we may need to reap what we've sown and it ain't gonna be pretty.

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •