Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 74

Thread: This is the result of the 'Vaccine Passport' system.

  1. #31
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    BINGO - When June 2022 comes around and the Ontario Election - There will one party for sure that will REMOVE all restrictions, passport and illegal restrictions. Mine - The Ontario Libertarian Party.



    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    Being ordered by your Government to get a vaccine, that isn't approved or face restrictions on your freedoms and your livelihoods...is a Dictatatorship.
    Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    Well you're wrong..

    15,000 fans were allowed to watch the game in person with EITHER proof of Vaccination OR a negative Covid case.

    In fact, the safest fans in the crowd were those unvaccinated that took the test...statistically 25% of those fully vaccinated were likely to have been carrying the virus.

    (if 74% of those testing positive are unvaccinated...that means 26% are fully vaccinated..but not much talk about that number )

    So don't be so Sanctimonious, you're more likely to have been exposed to the virus sitting in the stands with 15,000 people than sitting at home watching the game.
    The biggest risk takers were the unvaccinated as if they were infected they are the ones more likely to end up dead or on a ventilator. Those of us who've had the shots have a more optimistic outlook.

    Of course anyone would be less likely to be infected if they watched the game on TV. Anyone who wants to continue in perpetual lockdown can go right ahead.

  4. #33
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    The biggest risk takers were the unvaccinated as if they were infected they are the ones more likely to end up dead or on a ventilator. Those of us who've had the shots have a more optimistic outlook.

    Of course anyone would be less likely to be infected if they watched the game on TV. Anyone who wants to continue in perpetual lockdown can go right ahead.
    How about you contact each and every parent of these kids and spew your narrative at them Badenoch?

    "A report quietly released last week by Public Health Ontario (PHO) tallies the number of people in the province who have presented to hospital with heart inflammation following mRNA vaccination, and it skews heavily towards young people."

    "As of Aug. 7, there were 106 incidents of myocarditis/pericarditis in Ontarians under the age of 25. That’s slightly more than half of the total of all such incidents."

  5. #34
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    The biggest risk takers were the unvaccinated as if they were infected they are the ones more likely to end up dead or on a ventilator.
    Any idea how many of the un-vaccinated who where there with their negative Covid teats already had the virus and are now immune ??

    You don't. Because the government doesn't care or want to know...doesn't that make you wonder why ??

    Until they start accepting blood test results, that show positive for anti-bodies, to get an 'Immune' Passport, you know the whole 'passport' system is just a smokescreen to try and coerce everyone to get the mRNA vaccine, even if they don't need it.
    Last edited by MikePal; September 7th, 2021 at 07:28 AM.

  6. #35
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by impact View Post
    "As of Aug. 7, there were 106 incidents of myocarditis/pericarditis in Ontarians under the age of 25. That’s slightly more than half of the total of all such incidents."
    What is sad..they stopped vaccinating with the AstraZeneca when a handful of recipients got blood clots....but they just keep pumping these mNRA vaccines in the arms of the youth with no concern of how many are having adverse reactions.

    If the kids who know better try to refuse the vaccination due to these concerns, the 'haves' in society treat them like pariah.

  7. #36
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by line052 View Post
    BINGO - When June 2022 comes around and the Ontario Election - There will one party for sure that will REMOVE all restrictions, passport and illegal restrictions. Mine - The Ontario Libertarian Party.
    The above post would fall within the definition of political advertising. As we approach the 2022 Ontario election OOD will have to ensure that your self-promoting political posts do not contravene the Ontario Elections Act. Parties are paying increasing attention to on-line content both paid and unpaid.

  8. #37
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    The above post would fall within the definition of political advertising. .
    HaHa...what a load of hogwash...

  9. #38
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    HaHa...what a load of hogwash...
    https://www.ola.org/sites/default/fi...6/b307ra_e.pdf

    37.0.1 In determining whether an advertisement is a political advertisement, the Chief Electoral Officer shall consider, in addition to any other relevant factors,

    (a) whether it is reasonable to conclude that the advertising was specifically planned to coincide with the period referred to in section 37.10.1;

    (b) whether the formatting or branding of the advertisement is similar to a registered political party’s or registered
    candidate’s formatting or branding or election material;

    (c) whether the advertising makes reference to the election, election day, voting day, or similar terms;

    (d) whether the advertisement makes reference to a registered political party or registered candidate either directly or indirectly;


    (e) whether there is a material increase in the normal volume of advertising conducted by the person, organization, or entity;

    (f) whether the advertising has historically occurred during the relevant time of the year;

    (g) whether the advertising is consistent with previous advertising conducted by the person, organization, or entity;

    (h) whether the advertising is within the normal parameters of promotion of a specific program or activity; and

    (i) whether the content of the advertisement is similar to the political advertising of a party, constituency association,
    nomination contestant, candidate or leadership contestant registered under this Act.

  10. #39
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    The above post would fall within the definition of political advertising. As we approach the 2022 Ontario election OOD will have to ensure that your self-promoting political posts do not contravene the Ontario Elections Act. Parties are paying increasing attention to on-line content both paid and unpaid.


    LOL you should tell that to 99% of this forum.

  11. #40
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bowjob View Post
    LOL you should tell that to 99% of this forum.
    It's very different if you or I express an opinion versus a statement made by a registered political candidate.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •