In regards to the Nuremberg code

[Birdbuff]

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/corona...code-1.5576156

By the looks of it, the code does not apply.

[impact]

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/corona...code-1.5576156

By the looks of it, the code does not apply.

How about we let the courts decide and not paid MSM trolls?

Remember, crimes against humanity carry the death penalty.

"> Newly Released Documents on Wuhan Lab Funding
William G. September 7, 2021<"


Rand Paul
Responds Following Newly Released Documents on Wuhan
Lab Funding


_On Tuesday, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused Chief Medical Advisor to the President Anthony Fauci of lying to Congress, pointing to recently revealed documents outlining Fauci’s knowledge of gain-of-function research funded by the National Institute of Health and conducted in Wuhan, China.


Paul stated " I will be sending a letter to the Department of Justice asking for a criminal referral because he has lied to Congress.”


“[Fauci] realizes that once the public realizes that the NIH funded the Wuhan Lab…once the public figures out that they were doing very, very dangerous research there, gain-of-function research, taking animal viruses and making them more transmissible to humans, once everybody puts this together, he realizes where the blame is going to attach,” Paul continued. “If this came from the lab he was funding, my goodness, can you imagine the moral culpability the man has?”

[Badenoch]

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/corona...code-1.5576156

By the looks of it, the code does not apply.

The "Nuremburg Code" is neither referenced or incorporated in Canadian law and is therefore meaningless. It is however a significant component in the delusional imaginations of anti-vaxxers who harbour bizarre fantasies about an uprising of citizens who would forcibly seize government and stage Nuremberg-like trials followed by the executions of doctors and government officials who have promoted the COVID-19 vaccine.

[MikePal]

From the link posted by the OP..The Nerenmberg Code is not LAW anywhere.

" While the Nuremberg Code has not been officially adopted as law by any country, it’s had a massive influence on the development of medical ethics regulations globally, including Canadian ethics guidelines laid out by the Medical Research Council (MRC), now replaced by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

So yes it has sway with the medical community.

What is reality, is the fact that what it says :

From the Nurnemberg Code.." “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential… without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.”

Thus, as far as medical ethics go, YES there was a violation of that 'code' when the vaccine was used prior to being approved by the FDA (still not full tested) and now being mandatory in order to keep you job (coercion) and deny you of your civil liberties.

Not to mention the fraud and overreaching action of lockdowns and false claims of Covid deaths.

So while nothing 'illegal' has been conducted, there sure is a lot the Medical Community will have to answer to as they were the ones stearing the ship thru the storm.

[Badenoch]

From the link posted by the OP..The Nerenmberg Code is not LAW anywhere.

" While the Nuremberg Code has not been officially adopted as law by any country, it’s had a massive influence on the development of medical ethics regulations globally, including Canadian ethics guidelines laid out by the Medical Research Council (MRC), now replaced by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

So yes it has sway with the medical community.

What is reality, is the fact that what it says :

From the Nurnemberg Code.." “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential… without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.”

Thus, as far as medical ethics go, YES there was a violation of that 'code' when the vaccine was used prior to being approved by the FDA (still not full tested) and now being mandatory in order to keep you job (coercion) and deny you of your civil liberties.

Not to mention the fraud and overreaching action of lockdowns and false claims of Covid deaths.

So while nothing 'illegal' has been conducted, there sure is a lot the Medical Community will have to answer to as they were the ones stearing the ship thru the storm.

Answer to whom? The governments and medical regulatory bodies are supporting the decisions made by the medical community. The Nuremburg Code has the same legal and regulatory weight as the Hippocratic Oath which is none at all.

[impact]

Treason and crimes against humanity are punishable by death.
Proponents should think twice about committing the crimes.

They may have a choice of the execution method?....lol

Trump loosens US execution rules, allowing poison gas, firing squads

https://www.dw.com/en/trump-loosens-...ads/a-55758820

In damage control this morning Agent Badenoch?

[MikePal]

Answer to whom? The governments and medical regulatory bodies are supporting the decisions made by the medical community. The Nuremburg Code has the same legal and regulatory weight as the Hippocratic Oath which is none at all.

There are several codes of conduct.

The Hippocratic Oath discusses basic principles for medical professionals. This document dates back to the fifth century BCE.[5] Both The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and The Nuremberg Code (1947) are two well-known and well respected documents contributing to medical ethics. Other important markings in the history of medical ethics include Roe v. Wade in 1973 and the development of hemodialysis in the 1960s. More recently, new techniques for gene editing aiming at treating, preventing and curing diseases utilizing gene editing, are raising important moral questions about their applications in medicine and treatments as well as societal impacts on future generations, yet remain controversial due to their association with eugenics.

Who will they answer too...there are numerous organizations than can facilitated charges against humanity...has been done before:

The Council of Europe promotes the rule of law and observance of human rights in Europe. The Council of Europe adopted the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (1997) to create a uniform code of medical ethics for its 47 member-states. The Convention applies international human rights law to medical ethics. It provides special protection of physical integrity for those who are unable to consent, which includes children.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) also promotes the protection of human rights and human dignity. According to UNESCO, "Declarations are another means of defining norms, which are not subject to ratification. Like recommendations, they set forth universal principles to which the community of States wished to attribute the greatest possible authority and to afford the broadest possible support." UNESCO adopted the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and Biomedicine to advance the application of international human rights law in medical ethics. The Declaration provides special protection of human rights for incompetent persons

Any of these organizations can raise charges of Crimes Against Humanity and like the Nernberg trials will establish a trials if warranted...

The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place at the Nuremberg trials. Initially being considered for legal use, widely in International Law, following the Holocaust a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948. Political groups or states that violate or incite violation of human rights norms, as found in the Declaration, are an expression of the political pathologies associated with crimes against humanity.

Crimes against humanity have since been prosecuted by other international courts (for example, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court) as well as in domestic prosecutions. The law of crimes against humanity has primarily developed through the evolution of customary international law. Crimes against humanity are not codified in an international convention, although there is currently an international effort to establish such a treaty, led by the Crimes Against Humanity Initiative.

[impact]

Nice research Mike.

I can add this resource centre here as well with links including a video from Reiner Fuellmich.

https://breaking-news.ca/the-new-nur...are-this-info/

[Badenoch]

There are several codes of conduct.

Who will they answer too...there are numerous organizations than can facilitated charges against humanity...has been done before:

Any of these organizations can raise charges of Crimes Against Humanity and like the Nernberg trials will establish a trials if warranted...

The organizations that may bring charges are part of the bodies that are acquiring, distributing and promoting the vaccine so not much chance there. UNESCO and the Council of Europe can adopt whatever codes they want but they do not apply to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario or any other Canadian medical regulator.

So the delusional anti-vaxxer fantasies of world leaders swinging from the end of a rope will go unrealized. Maybe they can amuse themselves throwing pebbles at a campaign bus instead.

[MikePal]

the Council of Europe can adopt whatever codes they want

You're not grasping the topic and dragging this out without much success..call it a day,

The Council of Europe works mainly through conventions. By drafting conventions or international treaties, common legal standards are set for its member states. However, several conventions have also been opened for signature to non-member states.

There are 5 non-members states /observer countries: the Holy See, the United States, Canada, Japan, Mexico.