Page 12 of 36 FirstFirst ... 2567891011121314151617181922 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 351

Thread: Ontario gunsmith shot and killed by police

  1. #111
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhite View Post
    So how many years is a reasonable amount of time? 2,5,20?

    Well GW the victims are dead, the suspect is dead, at this juncture is time really important.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #112
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhite View Post
    So how many years is a reasonable amount of time? 2,5,20?
    The time varies. The SIU has a comprehensive website that notes when reports were received and when determinations were made. Even the simplest cases take several months.

    https://www.siu.on.ca/en/case_status.php

    Public inquiries of the type reviewing the Nova Scotia mass shooting can take much longer. For example, the inquiry into the wrongful conviction of Guy Paul Morin in the 90's took almost two years to report after it was established.

  4. #113
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhite View Post
    So how many years is a reasonable amount of time? 2,5,20?
    The FDA wants 55 year's to release all the vaccine data lol.

    This kind of a case in Ontario could take a few years lol

    Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

  5. #114
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glen View Post
    How long do investigations last in other areas. Traffic. Spills.
    I’d say four months should cover any investigation.
    Well it took 4 years to complete the Air India disaster and I am sure to this date the victims families do not have all the answers.

  6. #115
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Not surprising that the police officer who pulled the trigger isn't talking.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamil...date-1.6269099

    Toronto police officer who shot renowned gunsmith won't talk to SIU
    Bobby Hristova· CBC News· Posted: Dec 01, 2021 7:27 AM ET


    The Toronto police officer who shot gunsmith Rodger Kotanko nearly a month ago won't talk to Ontario's police watchdog.

    Special Investigations Unit (SIU) spokesperson Kristy Denette told CBC Hamilton on Tuesday morning, the subject officer also "declined to release his notes, as is his legal right."

    Kotanko's family and their lawyer say they're not surprised but are disappointed.

    "Jessie, his wife, she just cries all the time," Jeff Kotanko, Rodger's brother, said in an afternoon phone call.

    "She gave up her life in China to come here and spend her life with him and … now he's just gone and she's alone. Her whole life has been destroyed."

    Michael Smitiuch, the family's lawyer, said while he had a chance to speak with the lead investigator Monday evening, there are still numerous unanswered questions about Rodger's death on Nov. 3 at his Norfolk County property.

    "The family, obviously, is anxious to find out more information and the longer this goes, the more difficult it is for the family when they don't have the answers they're looking for," he said.

    Toronto police said officers arrived at Rodger's home on Port Ryerse Road around noon. Neighbours say some wore plain clothes and some wore tactical gear looking for guns. Family say they also had an ambulance with them.

    It's unclear what information they had because the family says it has never received a copy of the search warrant.
    Rodger's family also says Toronto police didn't coordinate with local police, only alerting them moments before executing the warrant — a move family and friends believe would have prevented Rodger's death.

    They say officers pointed assault rifles at Jessie and got her on the ground before approaching the gunsmithing workshop.

    They add Rodger was inside with an apparent customer working on a gun when a police officer standing outside the workshop shot him.

    The family lawyer has said Rodger had no criminal past and was a certified gunsmith who reportedly fixed guns for local police.

    Denette, from the SIU, said all but one person, excluding the officer who shot Rodger, needs to be interviewed. The investigation has included seven witness officers and two civilian witnesses.

    The next step in the investigation is ongoing forensic analysis and reviewing evidence, Denette said.

    The investigation must be finished by Mar. 3, 2022 — 120 days from when it started. When the investigation ends, the SIU director will release a public report about the findings only if there are no grounds to charge the police officer with a crime.

    Jeff has expressed his lack of confidence in the SIU, saying it is a process in which "cops (are) investigating cops."

    Former SIU directors say family needs to trust process
    André Marin, who served as SIU director between 1996 and 1998, said he understands the family's concerns.

    "I empathize with their frustration … the law, as it stands, does not force the subject officer to testify and I don't necessarily agree with it but that's the way the cookie crumbles," he said, adding it's common for officers to decline to participate in the investigation.

    Ian Scott, the former director from 2008 to 2013, said he understands why the subject officer has the right to decline an interview.

    "These are criminal investigations and the criminal procedure in our country does not support the admissibility of compelled statements which could incriminate somebody in a criminal matter so if they're not going to be admissible as evidence in a trial, I don't see the value," he said.

    Marin said in this case the SIU appears to have interviewed many witnesses, unlike other cases where someone is shot and the officer who pulled the trigger won't talk.

    He said, while the SIU isn't perfect, it is an independent, arms-length agency that has safeguards in place to protect conflicts of interest.

    Still, Erick Laming, a criminology lecturer at Trent University who researches police use of force and accountability, said the officer declining to speak still may lead to some public skepticism.

    Though Laming said cases like Kotanko's — where the family is desperate for more details — don't help the SIU's public image.

    "There's still a lot of improvement we can make, especially with the oversight we see," he said.

    Marin said the SIU must balance protecting its investigation with public transparency, saying Rodger's family is "In the dark to preserve the investigation so it is more credible."

    Scott said agencies like the SIU and police services won't ever be able to please everyone.

    "You're never going to get a complete consensus on the police's use of force and the reality is when police use force, whether it is lethal [or not], it's always tragic and frankly, ugly."

  7. #116
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    Not surprising that the police officer who pulled the trigger isn't talking.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamil...date-1.6269099
    That speaks volumes! If the SIU is involved it should be mandatory for the officers to participate in the investigation. This is very bad opics!!

  8. #117
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 410001661 View Post
    That speaks volumes! If the SIU is involved it should be mandatory for the officers to participate in the investigation. This is very bad opics!!
    prevents self-incrimination..

    admissibility of compelled statements which could incriminate somebody in a criminal matter so if they're not going to be admissible as evidence in a trial,

  9. #118
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 410001661 View Post
    That speaks volumes! If the SIU is involved it should be mandatory for the officers to participate in the investigation. This is very bad opics!!
    Fortunately, subject officers have the same rights as Joe citizen, where criminal investigations are concerned…
    “If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
    -Winston Churchill

  10. #119
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    Fortunately, subject officers have the same rights as Joe citizen, where criminal investigations are concerned…
    perhaps they should be held to a higher level of standard conduct, seeing as they are the ones upholding the law...

  11. #120
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kokes View Post
    perhaps they should be held to a higher level of standard conduct, seeing as they are the ones upholding the law...
    Oh, they are held to a higher standard. But they still are afforded the same rights against self-incrimination as any citizen…..
    “If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
    -Winston Churchill

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •