Nope. The left is generally afraid to criticize China for the reasons I mentioned. They have to consult their handy field manual of who takes priority on the latest victimology pyramid before doing anything, and run aground when torn between human rights abuses, extreme environmental negligence and their infatuation with the exotic and noble 'other'. Plus, the left historically has cozied up to dictators and idolizes communist & socialist regimes. Even today, after all we know about the horrors of Mao, Pot, Stalin, Castro, Guevara, etc. people still proudly wear communist symbols. Many professors still identify as Marxists. Many still downplay the failures of Venezuela and North Korea as overblown, rather than prime modern examples of a deeply pathological system. The left are the ones who most eagerly lap up the QR codes, vax passes and increased erosion of our basic liberties in an attempt to appear progressive and cosmopolitan.
Any slightly critical views by the outlets you mentioned would be an attempt to appear somewhat moderate. But they have to be careful, lest they bite the hand that feeds them.
The only real 'tough on China' rhetoric came from the right, and we can remember how people responded to Trump's rhetoric in this regard.
I am concerned with the absolutely disgusting human rights abuses of all people in China, which is why I'm critical of China...
It's good that you are too. You must be a liberal from 20 years ago. Not many of those still around. They've all somehow been labelled Nazis by the radical left.
Your comments on Europe vs the middle east could not be further from the truth, and are so patently absurd I'm not even sure where to begin.
Islam began through a mis-reading of the new testament. The Arabic people were goat herders and camel jockeys and were not sophisticated in any capacity. All the so-called advancements falsely attributed to the Islamic world were actually from the Persian empire (a very advanced civilization it would soon brutally slaughter and convert) and the Assyrians/Babylonians from about 2500 years before Islam invaded Mesopotamia.
The translations of ancient texts (mostly Greek philosophy) were actually done by early Christian monks / missionaries, who then passed them to Syrian Christian monks who translated them into Arabic.
One of the main reasons Islam didn't develop is because it was a philosophical dead-end. Its conception of God did not leave room for secondary causality, and so they couldn't properly comprehend science.
If you want to talk about Islamic contributions to the West we can perhaps begin with their contributions to modern airport security. Or the suicide vest, which was a real ground breaker!
As Billy Connolly says, "never trust anyone who only has one book"
Back to China, they have benefitted greatly from embracing capitalism. Many have increased their standard of living, bringing electricity and technology to remote villages, etc. Two problems:
1) Anything can be overdone, and gluttony is not good. I don't agree that wages should be driven down exponentially. Look at western greed, but also China's greed and incompetence.
2) The problem all non-Christian countries have (same with India, as the caste system is something you can never get out of) is that human life simply isn't valued the same way. People are much more disposable.
So China is a weird hybrid of perhaps the worst aspects of communism, capitalism and secularism. How to fix that? Well we can try fixing some of our own problems here first.
Attachment 42903