-
January 16th, 2022, 12:51 PM
#11

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
How many lives saved before you find it acceptable?
How about we listen to expert opinion?
https://rumble.com/vspkto-vaccines.html
-
January 16th, 2022 12:51 PM
# ADS
-
January 16th, 2022, 12:58 PM
#12
Hey impact, we can both agree on some kind of adverse affects of the vaccine. Can you agree that the vaccine has benefited many from suffering serious illness?
-
January 16th, 2022, 01:31 PM
#13

Originally Posted by
Birdbuff
Hey impact, we can both agree on some kind of adverse affects of the vaccine. Can you agree that the vaccine has benefited many from suffering serious illness?
Can you agree that the timely release of therapeutics by government agencies would have prevented millions of unnecessary deaths and injuries worldwide?
-
January 16th, 2022, 01:36 PM
#14

Originally Posted by
johnjyb
Canadian athlete out after having a bout with Covid19 and testing shows heart inflamation . No mention of how many jabs if any the healthy 25 year old had received to be able to globe-trot and play for his German club team, if any at all, but the narrative is that Covid caused it, not any jabs. Who decides Covid19 is the cause and not the needles??
John
Of course any Canadian msm outlet is going to be careful of any sentiment critical of the jabs.
As we all know, the chances of severe covid sickness for healthy people, especially young healthy people are extremely low. Common sense would indicate injecting yourself with an emergency-use experimental cocktail 2 or 3 times would be the more likely culprit. Vaccines also tend to harm those of African ethnicity more frequently.
We know there have been numerous athletes who've suffered severe side effects (including death) after the jabs, with myocarditis being the main one.
As with anything, we can wait until more info rolls out before confirming our suspicions. But certain things that contradict the narrative tend to get left behind.
-
January 16th, 2022, 01:41 PM
#15

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
Theres always a balance between society benefit and individual risks. Sure if a products safety is a concern it should be pulled. However fear mongering of 900 000 reports when most of them are for nothing more than irritations is a little narrative pushing. As always its your chioce but I wouldn't take it away from the majourity that find a benefit for it.
Sounds a very sensible response. These issues we face certainly common sense can achieve no argument there.
When money power and censorship get involved heavily influenced outcomes rule the day. Money and power can buy many lives
-
January 16th, 2022, 01:51 PM
#16

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
Theres always a balance between society benefit and individual risks. Sure if a products safety is a concern it should be pulled. However fear mongering of 900 000 reports when most of them are for nothing more than irritations is a little narrative pushing. As always its your chioce but I wouldn't take it away from the majourity that find a benefit for it.
The difference is that the covid #'s are also exaggerated, and this has been confirmed straight from the mouths of numerous horses.
The msm, the health 'experts' and others have been engaged in constant fear mongering for over a year & a half, yet only one side is flagged for 'misinformation'. Why?
And it isn't a clean wash -- it's not like we have our pick of the blue car or the red car that perform exactly the same so who cares.
If the majority of covid cases, say 75% are just an irritation, and a minority of vax cases, say 40%, result in just an irritation, that's still a huge fail for the vax relatively speaking. Especially when we were all promised 100% efficacy and a return to normal life...and many made the decision to jab themselves based off this.
I understand your point but this is a pretty important distinction.
-
January 16th, 2022, 01:55 PM
#17
-
January 16th, 2022, 08:10 PM
#18
-
January 16th, 2022, 08:25 PM
#19
-
January 16th, 2022, 08:28 PM
#20

Originally Posted by
impact
Taken out of context I believe, but you guys decide. Logically I can’t see why a CEO would try to sabotage his company.
https://www.reuters.com/article/fact...-idUSL1N2TT29Z