Social Credit Score

[MikePal]

If you haven't got up to speed on what all the talk is about with the development of a 'Social Credit Score'...time to pay attention.

China’s social credit system is a combination of government and business surveillance that gives citizens a “score” that can restrict the ability of individuals to take actions — such as purchasing plane tickets, acquiring property or taking loans — because of behaviors. Given the position of several major American companies, a similar system may be coming here sooner than you think.

The potential scope of the soft social credit system under construction is enormous. The same companies that can track your activities and give you corporate rewards for compliant behavior could utilize their powers to block transactions, add surcharges or restrict your use of products. At what point does free speech — be it against biological males playing in girls’ sports, questioning vaccine side effects, or advocating for gun rights — make someone a target in this new system? When does your debit card get canceled over old tweets, your home loan denied for homeschooling your kids, or your eBay account invalidated because a friend flagged you for posting a Gadsden flag?

from ..a good read; https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...-credit-system

Cutting to the chase, this is a good summary.

https://rumble.com/vwgtfl-social-credit-score.html


The pandemic proved that the largest purveors of misinformation were the Politicains (via MSM) ..and they will be the ones who will decide if what you print/post/buy/say is along party lines or misinformation. And they have the tools to restrict you, cancel you, your bank accounts (Truckers) and even your insurance policies.

Time to wake up and see what all those tracking apps ( Arrive Can, QR codes, GPS tracking, FB) you've put on your phones for convenience, actually allows them to watch, study and know all about you...even what you eat using the food delivery and grocery purchase apps.

Conspiracy theory...not a chance, already in place.

[MikePal]

Example: Today's headline

Russian lawmakers approve prison for anyone spreading 'fake' reports on Ukraine war

(understanding it's the government who decides what is 'Fake' news. )

Surely even the staunchest Liberal mind can see the parallel in principle to what the Village Idiot did with the Truckers....

[Birdbuff]

I understand the fear coming from this kind of theory. But I believe in a democratic situation it would be much more difficult to implement this kind of system. Phone apps, bank transactions and social media posts have been “go to” tracking tools for a while now. Smart devices do listen in on conversations and technology is a double edged sword. But it would be a very hard sell for a government to openly program a social credit system on a freedom loving society. Our armies and police have freedom of thought and are not indoctrinated like China and Russia.

[gbk]

I understand the fear coming from this kind of theory. But I believe in a democratic situation it would be much more difficult to implement this kind of system. Phone apps, bank transactions and social media posts have been “go to” tracking tools for a while now. Smart devices do listen in on conversations and technology is a double edged sword. But it would be a very hard sell for a government to openly program a social credit system on a freedom loving society. Our armies and police have freedom of thought and are not indoctrinated like China and Russia.

It’s Easier To Fool People Than To Convince Them That They’ve Been Fooled.

While i am not into conspiracy theories ,the likelihood of this happening is more then probable.
To what degree and which fields-we have yet to see.

Why? It works for everyone-except the small guy.
If(when)it will happen-we will never know.
It will come unannounced ,small steps at the time,over 1-2 generations.
Or -a major world event will speed it up,used as Casus "Belli".

Actually-it is already here ,in many ways.

By the time it is all over ...no one will know any better.
Those few they would-and dare ,will be silenced/marginalized/made pariah.

[newbiehunter]

Our armies and police have freedom of thought and are not indoctrinated like China and Russia.

That depends who you ask. Lol.

The introduction of such system won't be instant.. it's all about building a habit in population
first, let just switch to government backed Bitcoin
because fiat is having so much trouble (financial instability is already there)

Then switch centralized health card,ID,
e-wallet,TTC metro pass, Air tickets, vaccine ID on your phone - because it's "fast, safe and convenient "

Then, grab some incident that has a public tearing up about some child being hurt or what ever other emotional means and use it to "It could have been prevented only if we were had laws in place to tie their social speeches to block their access in advance". You get some antiFA "hey hey ho ho" crowd to walk around, PM kneels for the poor little child, everyone get brains washed that "we have to give up our rights for the good of society to stop the criminals"

And there you have it - a social system in place...


When introduced gradually - the brainwashed public will gladly accept it,
Afterall good guys have nothing to hide, right ?

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

[Birdbuff]

And what is the other option? Reject technology?

Our youth is hooked on technology, they know nothing else. My kids know how to use an iPad and it’s apps far better than I do. The schools openly encourage the use of calculators (it was frowned upon in my day) to achieve answers that could be done long hand. Computers, tablets and smart boards have taken front stage to the old fashioned way of printing or cursive writing ideas on paper. Almost every child in 6th grade and up has a smart phone. This is a world wide phenomenon.

The conditioning to be technologically dependent is occurring whether we like it or not. Brains will go unchallenged and become weak in future generations. Those that reject technology will be outcasts, left behind.

The social scores of society won’t really matter, there won’t be much use of a large population in the future.

[newbiehunter]

And what is the other option? Reject technology?

Our youth is hooked on technology, they know nothing else. My kids know how to use an iPad and it’s apps far better than I do. The schools openly encourage the use of calculators (it was frowned upon in my day) to achieve answers that could be done long hand. Computers, tablets and smart boards have taken front stage to the old fashioned way of printing or cursive writing ideas on paper. Almost every child in 6th grade and up has a smart phone. This is a world wide phenomenon.

The conditioning to be technologically dependent is occurring whether we like it or not. Brains will go unchallenged and become weak in future generations. Those that reject technology will be outcasts, left behind.

The social scores of society won’t really matter, there won’t be much use of a large population in the future.

To be honest, I keep thinking about it and cannot come up with a reliable solution in my head..
I agree you cannot reject tech innovation - simply impossible.. it brings benefits and dangers at the same time.

The dangers is in of how tech gets used and who owns your data. That why it makes sense to have strong pushback on any privacy breaking laws and "society over individual" rhetoric.

Every little move nowdays against the above values is a slippery slope..that could and will get used against the same individuals.. I am strong believer that legal framework should be in place to protect individual data, so that when this data is used secretly - at very least they can go back in court and raise all kinds of stink..

Unfortunately, the complete opposite is actually happening



Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

[newbiehunter]

Estonia has a pretty decent attempt to handle this problem.
They are one of the most advanced countries in this field. Everything is digitized, however individuals have can at any point review who accessed their data and for what reason.
If they disagree or consider access illegal, they can officially dispute such access and force government officials to provide a detailed explanation for certain access request

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

[GloHole]

It's being pushed through as we speak bill C11 and C36, they will be able to fine or imprison you for your thoughts, look them up. Right now the WHO is trying to pass a treaty that will give them and their partner the U.N. sole control over your country and the world for what the deem a world health risk, don't forget they recently changed the definition of a pandemic to fit the narrative of the one that just passed. Back in 2018 Bill Gates in an interview said that there would be two pandemics and repeated it again this January. Ukraine is/was home to 15 bioweapons labs Kazkhstan had one and is the new home of the NWO with all their Masonic infrastructure in place. Digital ID is already here if you don't believe in conspiracy theories now would be a good time to start. Noah was a conspiracy theorist and then it began to rain, I'm sure you know the rest of the story.

[fishfood]

Would misleading information come government and cdc withholding information is a form of misinformation.

When governments get to pick what the public gets to know on the information it want you to know is corruption.

So the big guys can manipulate the people.


I heard Russia might be doing a good thing towards this current corrupt government leader's.

Using the pandemic for opportunities that wouldn't have a chance without is again is corruption. When you use a pandemic for opportunities they will base it on the agenda not the health of us individually.

Rant over lol.



Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk