-
March 14th, 2014, 12:11 PM
#1
Big cuts coming to Moose Tags???
I'm hearing rumours that aerial surveys have shown dismal results in some of Ontario's Moose strongholds and drastic cuts to tags are coming for this season. Some areas could get cut as much as 80%. I wish I had more information but my understanding is final numbers have not been set yet.
I'm not too surprised after Minnesota cancelled its Moose hunt last year then from what I heard Moose hunting was not very good in many places last year in Ontario. Is this the end of Moose hunting in Ontario as we know it? With Deer suffering with one of the worst winters in many years its not looking too good for big game hunting in 2014.
-
March 14th, 2014 12:11 PM
# ADS
-
March 14th, 2014, 01:21 PM
#2
I'd believe it . seems every year we need more guys for a guarantee . its getting ridiculous
-
March 14th, 2014, 05:46 PM
#3
how can we have a sustainable population when the natives slaughter the moose out of shear spite?
-
March 14th, 2014, 06:00 PM
#4
If only everyone actually needed a tag...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadian Waterfowl Supplies Pro Staff | Go Hunt Birds Field Staff
-
March 14th, 2014, 06:03 PM
#5
Popcorn is popping...just cracked my beer... please proceed to blame all hunting and fishing problems on FN.
-
March 14th, 2014, 06:07 PM
#6

Originally Posted by
Fishy Wishy
Popcorn is popping...just cracked my beer... please proceed to blame all hunting and fishing problems on FN.
Not blaming it entirely on them at all...
But if there is truly a problem with the herds, limiting one group, while still allowing a free for all for another, doesn't seem like sound management strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadian Waterfowl Supplies Pro Staff | Go Hunt Birds Field Staff
-
March 14th, 2014, 06:10 PM
#7

Originally Posted by
TurkeyRookie
Not blaming it entirely on them at all...
But if there is truly a problem with the herds, limiting one group, while still allowing a free for all for another, doesn't seem like sound management strategy.
According to Toddc they "slaughter the moose out of shear spite" then you hitched your horse to that wagon.
I have known and grown up with FN as friends and in mentor roles...certainly they never "slaughtered" ANYTHING "out of shear spite"
Last edited by Fishy Wishy; March 14th, 2014 at 06:12 PM.
-
March 14th, 2014, 06:18 PM
#8
Will this mean cuts to the number of tags allocated to outfitters too?
-
March 14th, 2014, 06:18 PM
#9

Originally Posted by
Fishy Wishy
then you hitched your horse to that wagon.
Not sure at what point in my statement I jumped on the killing for spite slaughter wagon, but I think my point of cutting back numbers for one group, while still allowing full unrestricted access for another being a poor way to manage things is a far cry from Todc's statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadian Waterfowl Supplies Pro Staff | Go Hunt Birds Field Staff
-
March 14th, 2014, 06:24 PM
#10

Originally Posted by
TurkeyRookie
Not sure at what point in my statement I jumped on the killing for spite slaughter wagon, but I think my point of cutting back numbers for one group, while still allowing full unrestricted access for another being a poor way to manage things is a far cry from Todc's statement.
With treaties as they are...the province has no power to change that as far as I know...so in planning you gotta include the population killed by FN as they would attribute to other predators like wolves and cougars.
Now I do remember reading about how the idea of unrestricted calf harvest was a bad idea but was part of the negotiation when the current lottery and tags were introduced.