Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Moose draw...can someone explain?

  1. #1
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default Moose draw...can someone explain?

    We bow hunt area 23. They dropped bull tags from 52 to 21 for a 60% drop. They then changed the gun hunt bull tags in the same area from 74 to 44 for a 40% drop. WTF are bow hunters more successful? You would think bow hunters are being discriminated against. Maybe my math sucks. I am one upset bowhunter.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #2
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Join the crowd! Not too many moose hunters are happy campers this year !

  4. #3
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I see the 30 tags each, but the % are crazy out of wack. Saving the moose population is paramount. But lets be honest alot less success per person in archery than gun hunting. This about money in license revenues and votes.We do not even have a guarenteed group size as archers were gun hunters still have one.

  5. #4
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Everyone seems to be taking a hit this year. Fairness does not seem to be a factor. Another upset moose hunter. B525

  6. #5
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Bow hunters always get screwed when it comes to tags. Were a minority in the moose hunting world.
    How is it one careless cigarette can cause a forest fire, but it takes a whole box of matches to light a campfire?

  7. #6
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Ok so now I am really mad. Area 15b gets hit hard for tag reductions Gun bull this year 463 tags last year 879 for a differance of 416 tags. Bow bull this year 31 tags , last year 53tags for a differance of 22 tags. What the heck area 23, 30 each for gun and bow another area 15b, 416 and 22 respectively. What is going on? Sounds like one area works off a percentage and the other just a number assigned equally. Need some input so I can understand.

  8. #7
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Sounds like someone outsourced the guesstimating down south like our licensing. Maybe they picked no's out of a hat!

  9. #8
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robster View Post
    Sounds like someone outsourced the guesstimating down south like our licensing. Maybe they picked no's out of a hat!
    That is silly funnie..... I would really like to see their rational (facts/findings) for coming up with the specific numbers. Transparency goes a long way.
    "Everything is easy when you know how"
    "Meat is not grown in stores"

  10. #9
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The fact that they're using round numbers surely shows that there's no science or math to it.

    And bowhunters pay the same for licenses as the gun guys. And they stay at the same camps, pay the same for gas, drive the same distances. etc etc ..

    Why are not all units open to bowhunting. Especially in this day and age! Bowhunting is not something "new".

    More bowhunters would mean fewer gun hunters as guys make the transformation.

    A lower bow success rate seems logical to me that the MNR would be promoting this everywhere!

    But like I stated earlier ... "no science - no math"

    I've got a bag of hammers in the garage with more brains then what I have seen over the years!

  11. #10
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SK33T3R View Post
    The fact that they're using round numbers surely shows that there's no science or math to it.

    And bowhunters pay the same for licenses as the gun guys. And they stay at the same camps, pay the same for gas, drive the same distances. etc etc ..

    Why are not all units open to bowhunting. Especially in this day and age! Bowhunting is not something "new".

    More bowhunters would mean fewer gun hunters as guys make the transformation.

    A lower bow success rate seems logical to me that the MNR would be promoting this everywhere!

    But like I stated earlier ... "no science - no math"

    I've got a bag of hammers in the garage with more brains then what I have seen over the years!

    I'm not sure what you mean,here,Skeeter. Archery gear can still be used during the gun season,we just need to wear blaze orange. Do you mean ALL WMU's should be open for an "archery only" season before the gun hunt? How would that help this situation?
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •