Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Is this a tiger trout?

  1. #31
    Travelling Tackle Shop

    User Info Menu

    Default

    It's a speckle for sure, I could barely make out the light and dark vertical bars in the picture which are typical of a juvenile speckle. They lose the bars as they age. It's usually more pronounced on the smaller ones, from what I read years ago, they disappear when the fish hits sexual maturity.

    Roe+
    A bad day hunting or fishing is better than a good day at work.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    People think that natural hybridization doesn't occur. I catch tiger muskie quite often and we definitely don't have a stocking program for them here.

    But yeah thats a speck haha

  4. #33
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Nope it's a Brookie.
    Why do I buy 10 pounds of minnows to catch 3 pounds of fish?

  5. #34
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blumpkinturlet View Post
    People think that natural hybridization doesn't occur. I catch tiger muskie quite often and we definitely don't have a stocking program for them here.

    But yeah thats a speck haha
    Natural hybridization obviously occurs, its just far more prevalent in some fish (like muskie/pike) then others (salmonids). Part of the reason is that brook trout arent actually a trout, they're a char, and not all that closely related to true trout.

  6. #35
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    It is a speckle have been fishing all over Ontario for well over fifty years

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •