-
July 12th, 2014, 11:39 AM
#21
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
brent
Regardless of what the Highway Traffic Act says, the Highway Traffic Act does not apply on a trail. Therefore the definition under the HTA would not apply.
The Act that covers this is the FWCA. And yes, a bicycle is considered a vehicle under the FWCA.
As for the definition surrounding canoe, it is not considered a motor vehicle under the Highway Traffic Act, but it is under the Criminal Code when it comes to impaired driving, etc. Under the FWCA, a canoe is considered a "boat".
Yes it is a boat.. But it is not under motor power... The act states a boat with a motor.. (Exception. Being when hunting migratory birds)
Member of the OFAH, CCFR/CCDAF.
http://firearmrights.ca/
-
July 12th, 2014 11:39 AM
# ADS
-
July 13th, 2014, 08:47 AM
#22
“vehicle” means any kind of vehicle that is driven, propelled or drawn on land or ice by any kind of power, including muscular power, and includes the rolling stock of a railway; (“véhicule”)
24. (1) A person shall not use a vehicle for the purpose of killing, injuring, capturing, harassing, pursuing or chasing wildlife.
Boats
(2) A person shall not use a boat for the purpose of killing, injuring, capturing, harassing, pursuing or chasing wildlife.
Aircraft
(3) A person shall not use an aircraft while hunting.
Exceptions
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not apply in the circumstances prescribed by the regulations. 1997, c. 41, s. 24.
Here you go.
Redd
-
July 13th, 2014, 09:51 AM
#23
I just came across this "beast" bicycle this morning. Check it out!
http://daymak.com/beast/
-
July 13th, 2014, 10:44 AM
#24
-
July 13th, 2014, 10:56 AM
#25

Originally Posted by
brent
Regardless of what the Highway Traffic Act says, the Highway Traffic Act does not apply on a trail. Therefore the definition under the HTA would not apply.
The Act that covers this is the FWCA. And yes, a bicycle is considered a vehicle under the FWCA.
As for the definition surrounding canoe, it is not considered a motor vehicle under the Highway Traffic Act, but it is under the Criminal Code when it comes to impaired driving, etc. Under the FWCA, a canoe is considered a "boat".
Actually, FWIW, a canoe is not a motor vehicle under the code, where impaired operation is concerned.
It is a vessel.
-
July 13th, 2014, 12:04 PM
#26

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Actually, FWIW, a canoe is not a motor vehicle under the code, where impaired operation is concerned.
It is a vessel.
So what does that mean in regard to impaired operation of a canoe? Can one be charged for that?
You’re lucky to have the gear you already have. Some people wish they had stuff as nice as the stuff you think isn’t good enough. - Bill Heavey
-
July 13th, 2014, 12:06 PM
#27
Apology to the OP for derailing the thread a bit by shifting from bikes to canoes. Just curious.
You’re lucky to have the gear you already have. Some people wish they had stuff as nice as the stuff you think isn’t good enough. - Bill Heavey
-
July 13th, 2014, 12:32 PM
#28
-
July 13th, 2014, 01:01 PM
#29

Originally Posted by
smallgamer
So what does that mean in regard to impaired operation of a canoe? Can one be charged for that?
Impaired in a canoe.....Darwin should take care of that.
-
July 13th, 2014, 04:13 PM
#30

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
Impaired in a canoe.....Darwin should take care of that.
Yeah OK, Mom. So no one here has never had a couple pops and then paddled? I'm not talking about slurring, staggering, falling down drunk. I'm talking about a beer or three on the deck of a cottage, and then taking a canoe out for a paddle or to throw a few casts.
You’re lucky to have the gear you already have. Some people wish they had stuff as nice as the stuff you think isn’t good enough. - Bill Heavey