Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 57

Thread: What steel loads do you use?

  1. #31
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dead Ringer View Post
    I wonder if there's any test data on actual velocity on target for these speed loads. Everyone gets worked up about 200fps, but that's muzzle velocity. What's the speed (and hence momentum) difference on target?
    Yes there is oodles of evidence proven, search for example over at the duckhuntingchat shot shells and reloading forum/pages, because deceleration is a parabolic curve a difference of 200fps at the muzzles equates to a MUCH bigger velocity difference at 40 yards. If you want to shoot slow shot then shoot BIG shot BBB's or T's hold their momentum/energy much further afield.......at the end of the day you still can't argue with Mr. Newton even 300 years later.

    i also agree with familiarity with your gun/load, but for Christ's sake put the odds in your favour before you get familiar, been there done that...

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maarsey View Post
    Thanks boys didn't mean to cause any contraversy with this subject. I have always used federal 3-3.5 BB out of my gun and they have always worked for me just have seen a lot of hevi metal on videos and pictures Latley thought I would ask! Thanks a lot for input fellas! My spelling an grammar isn't vet good hope yas don't mind lol!

    No no controversy, it's a forum, everyone has an opinion, it's all good

  4. #33
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maarsey View Post
    My spelling an grammar isn't vet good hope yas don't mind lol!
    This is a hunting and fishing forum, not an English class room, no need to apologize for that!

    If we have to start watching our spelling and grammar, before you know it, we'll have to stop telling lies to!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Canadian Waterfowl Supplies Pro Staff | Go Hunt Birds Field Staff

  5. #34
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frosty View Post
    Yes there is oodles of evidence proven, search for example over at the duckhuntingchat shot shells and reloading forum/pages, because deceleration is a parabolic curve a difference of 200fps at the muzzles equates to a MUCH bigger velocity difference at 40 yards. If you want to shoot slow shot then shoot BIG shot BBB's or T's hold their momentum/energy much further afield.......at the end of the day you still can't argue with Mr. Newton even 300 years later.

    i also agree with familiarity with your gun/load, but for Christ's sake put the odds in your favour before you get familiar, been there done that...
    Thanks for the enlightenment. Good to know.

    Like Gadwall, I like the lighter loads for greater velocity on speedy birds.

  6. #35
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maarsey View Post
    Thanks boys didn't mean to cause any contraversy with this subject.
    Haha! Ask any opinion on here and there's bound to be a discussion!

  7. #36
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    200fps is quite the difference with any shotgun load. Think target loads. A 1200fps handicap trap load had quite a bit more punch down range than a 1000fps load.

    The loads Sinker (and I) shoot are 1425fps. Only 75fps off the usual 1550. Kent makes a 1 1/4oz. load in 3.5" that's around 1650fps.

  8. #37
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TurkeyRookie View Post
    This is a hunting and fishing forum, not an English class room, no need to apologize for that!

    If we have to start watching our spelling and grammar, before you know it, we'll have to stop telling lies to!
    i resemble that remark lol

  9. #38
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I try to keep my shots a lot closer than 40yds. I think a lot of guys can't guess range very well too. Some guys think 40yds is 25, and others think 40 is 80. I like to keep them close. Most of my shots past 40yds are at a cripple, or a bird that I know has been hit, and need to come down. I don't lift the gun until they are at least 25yds.....or less.

    Sure, I take the odd poke out to, and past 40, but its gotta be a real slow day, or a trophy bird. The thrill for me is getting them close and working the birds.

    I also agree with Gadwall. I've been shooting the same shells for a loooong time. I tried some remington sportsmans the year before last, and found they were like shooting air...meanwhile my buddy beside me is smacking them down with them......so it just goes to show ya......get used to a shell and keep atter. It does make a difference.

    S

  10. #39
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gadwall View Post
    My thought has always been, practise kills birds. Find a load, speed and weight, that you fell comfortable with and stay with it ... constantly changing shells leads to missed or crippled birds, and frusteration with misses ... you will form a natural memory for your lead and pull if you stay with the same shells. It seems to me that not all shells that state the same speeds for the load shoot the same, maybe the wadding is making the difference ... but I find the Winchester my least favorite, I find the Kents and Challenger shoot similar for the same load shells, and 90% of the shells I shoot are Kents, 1 1/8oz when primarily shooting divers and 1 1/4oz when primarily shooting mallards ... but that is just my preference, I like the faster shell for the faster duck and denser pattern for the slow, heafty, fat birds.
    A good shell is one that is consistent!
    Don’t believe the manufacturers’ velocity claims. Some are close to what they say, others are way off.
    As stated earlier, not the muzzle velocity, but the velocity at the target matters. However, that’s only a result of the muzzle velocity and shot size (and of density of course).
    Having said that, I don’t think these ultra-fast loads make any sense. It’s just a sales pitch to sell you less (i.e. metal, the little bit of extra powder is way cheaper) for significantly more money!
    Just step up a shot size. Some guy said he shoots #4 and bigger shot to follow up on cripples – why on earth are you doing this if you already know you end up with cripples? Problem is that big shots may carry sufficient energy, but at 40yrds there are just not enough shots left. So, you have to step up with the load. If you do that, need to consider going either 3.5” steel or the expensive 2 ¾ or 3”. By the way, get some that have defined shot size (not the hevi metal garbage, which may look only good on paper, but will have a questionable shot string in the air).
    Long story short, I’ decided last year to use up all my expensive stuff (besides the wingmaster hd it was a complete waste of money) and stick to mid-priced steel (medium speed, larger shots, heavier loads). I hope sooner than later I get my spreads refined enough that I can revise my statement to “at 20yrds it doesn’t matter…”
    Make sure you stick to one load. By the way, the lead with target (lead) loads (summer practice) can be very different than #2 or BB at a distance.

  11. #40
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Huge difference in steel vs lead when it comes to leading a bird for sure! I now suck at shooting lead shot....I prefer steel!! Crazy, I know, but I can shoot steel better!

    S.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •