-
September 18th, 2014, 08:47 AM
#101
How about the MNR closing the non resident hunt.
No more tags for non residents.
Just a thought.
-
September 18th, 2014 08:47 AM
# ADS
-
September 18th, 2014, 09:01 AM
#102

Originally Posted by
gunter
How about the MNR closing the non resident hunt.
No more tags for non residents.
Just a thought.
It wouldn't make any appreciable difference because the non-resident harvest is merely a drop-in-the-bucket compared to the rest of us. The entire south of Ontario below the French-Mattawa is already closed to non-resident Moose hunting and has been for decades..
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
September 18th, 2014, 09:26 AM
#103
The non-resident harvest is very small in most WMUs. Someone suggested closing down Aboriginal moose hunting for a period to see the population rebound, and yet no one has suggested closing down licensed hunting. A short-term closure of all moose hunting by all parties would likely result in an increase in moose populations, at least until skewed sex ratios became an issue.
-
September 18th, 2014, 09:34 AM
#104

Originally Posted by
werner.reiche
Moose don't really have 'calving grounds'...they calve where they live all year. I think you're confusing migrating caribou issues with moose issues - two totally different sets of problems.
..Unless you consider elimination of bears and wolves from calving grounds the issue.
Perhaps "calving ground" not the best term. My understanding is a cow moose will not put up with very much human intrusion into a preferred calving area before abandoning it for future years. I'm sure they abandon those sites if they're bothered repeatedly by predators at them as well.
Last edited by outdoorlife; September 18th, 2014 at 09:37 AM.
-
September 18th, 2014, 09:38 AM
#105

Originally Posted by
outdoorlife
Perhaps "calving ground" not the best term. My understanding is a cow moose will not put up with very much human intrusion into a preferred calving area before abandoning it for future years.
Never heard that theory before and it doesn't make much sense, given that moose don't have a 'preferred calving area'. They calve where they live. What you seem to be saying is that human intrusion into moose range will cause moose to abandon the area, which we know to be false.
-
September 18th, 2014, 10:58 AM
#106

Originally Posted by
wolfhunter
I think its a combination of ALL the above. Native hunters, Crossbows, deer pushed into area, increase of predators, city expansion. There are probably a few more as well, like restricting tags so guide outfits can use them, etc,etc,etc......
Hey, didn't you used to be HOWA 7mm??
"I may not have gone where I was supposed to go, but I ended up where I was supposed to be"
-
September 18th, 2014, 11:15 AM
#107
-
September 18th, 2014, 11:32 AM
#108
Aren't we all
"I may not have gone where I was supposed to go, but I ended up where I was supposed to be"
-
September 18th, 2014, 01:45 PM
#109

Originally Posted by
trimmer21
It wouldn't make any appreciable difference because the non-resident harvest is merely a drop-in-the-bucket compared to the rest of us. The entire south of Ontario below the French-Mattawa is already closed to non-resident Moose hunting and has been for decades..
We were up in Gerelton 3 years ego for a archery moose hunt.
four of us from Ontario
All the rest of the archery hunters were from the states six in total.
I had a talk with them they come up every year easy to get tags they pay for them.
And yes they had 2 moose in the cooler.
-
September 19th, 2014, 03:59 AM
#110
How about we all don't buy a tag next year that will wake up the MNR