-
November 26th, 2014, 03:11 PM
#71

Originally Posted by
skypilot
You evidently missed the "TEAED"off vs TEED off in Joe's original post, you know.... Tea ed off, Tee ed off. Guess you had to be there. I'll just show get my hat and show myself out..........
Way over my head. lol
-
November 26th, 2014 03:11 PM
# ADS
-
November 26th, 2014, 03:24 PM
#72

Originally Posted by
trimmer21
Too bad we can't sue The Spec and Mr.Doofus for slander and defamation of character.....or can we?
Some people just have a habit of jumping to conclusions without all the facts. I can't say I ever got to read the original story in the Spec but the news articles in the OP's original post have nothing to do with the Spec. Anyone have a link to the original story in the Spec?
-
November 27th, 2014, 12:02 PM
#73
According to the " Spectator " this morning, the police have concluded their investigation and found that Moonpie the pony was NOT shot by an arrow' as previously thought by most, they said that the pony " fell into a small well like hole and impaled himself on a metal t-bar stuck into the ground".
After taking pictures and finding blood on the metal stake and in the footprints of the pony after it had extricated itself from the stake , this is what they had determined and have ended their investigation.
-
November 27th, 2014, 12:29 PM
#74

Originally Posted by
jaycee
According to the " Spectator " this morning, the police have concluded their investigation and found that Moonpie the pony was NOT shot by an arrow' as previously thought by most, they said that the pony " fell into a small well like hole and impaled himself on a metal t-bar stuck into the ground".
After taking pictures and finding blood on the metal stake and in the footprints of the pony after it had extricated itself from the stake , this is what they had determined and have ended their investigation.
Also in the article - Mr. Stoltzfus does not accept this finding and is adamant that the wound was caused by an arrow.
-
November 27th, 2014, 12:48 PM
#75

Originally Posted by
M_P
Also in the article - Mr. Stoltzfus does not accept this finding and is adamant that the wound was caused by an arrow.
Spoken like someone afraid of the backlash. What a moron.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
November 27th, 2014, 12:52 PM
#76
Stoltzfus sounds like a real jerk -
-
November 27th, 2014, 12:59 PM
#77

Originally Posted by
William Cody
Some people just have a habit of jumping to conclusions without all the facts. I can't say I ever got to read the original story in the Spec but the news articles in the OP's original post have nothing to do with the Spec. Anyone have a link to the original story in the Spec?
Yep! Please see the original post. Links are provided.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
November 27th, 2014, 01:07 PM
#78
Sounds live Stoltzfus is a real piece of work. With the problem he's trying to cause, he'd now be a DNR in my division.
-
November 27th, 2014, 01:32 PM
#79
Perhaps he should be charged for causing undue suffering an death for poor ol moonpie since he felt it was ok to keep him in such poor and dangerous conditions.
-
November 27th, 2014, 02:56 PM
#80
Not sure if that explains the fence getting cut or evidence of a broadhead