Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Confusion and Paranoia

  1. #11
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Any reloader knows that between lot #'s of powder , pressures and consequently velocity can and does vary.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #12
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Jaycee

    Yes that statement is true but in this case with 4759 it does not apply. Powder manufacturers keep a reasonably close tolerance to the powder they manufacture. Not a difference of close to 10%.

    The old 4759 came in 1/2lb cans and for years after many cans used the average velocity of 2300fps was experienced with 43grs. Then Hodgdon bought IMR and not long after that the 1lb plastic container of 4759 appeared. Here other shooters began to experience a loss of about 100fps with their 43gr load with the 1lb plastic container of 4759. In order to regain that velocity most found that by changing that load up 46.5-47grs they again acquired 2300fps. I also did a PT test to see the difference between the two 4759 powders and got a difference of about 5000 PSI.

    Now if you want to believe your statement about lot variance applying here you go right ahead.


    Ed

  4. #13
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaycee View Post
    Any reloader knows that between lot #'s of powder , pressures and consequently velocity can and does vary.
    Quote Originally Posted by ET1 View Post
    Powder manufacturers keep a reasonably close tolerance to the powder they manufacture. Not a difference of close to 10%.
    I find it hard to believe that a powder manufacture like IMR would allow a variance in production between lots outside a fairly tight tolerance to the spec. I used to do Spec Functionality Audits with companies like IMR who supply to the government and they wouldn't be in business long if they couldn't meet the specs with every lot #.

  5. #14
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Mike normally you would be correct. 4759 had some pretty major swings. 200 fps has widely been reported.

  6. #15
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Jack View Post
    Mike normally you would be correct. 4759 had some pretty major swings. 200 fps has widely been reported.
    Makes me wonder how many of the issues that were reported were actually from a variance in the powder itself or simply the other variables affecting the load. A change in primer can see a 200 ft/sec change in velocity.

    It would be interesting to find out the real reasons IMR stopped production, maybe more to the story than just "outdated technology, high manufacturing costs and low sales".


  7. #16
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Not primer related. Even Chuck Hawk reported in on it.

    With other powders I don't see that much of a swing maybe 30-50fps which is nothing much in my book with a cf.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •