Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 107

Thread: Purina law suit

  1. #71
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by last5oh_302 View Post
    Yes,,lol I edited my last post to add exactly that YD.

    Especially when you see lists like this:

    http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food-recalls/
    Wow a bunch of raw dog foods on the top of the list. I never thought I would see that since they are so healthy. Goes to show it can happen to any company and even more reason to shop and buy from a small reputable Canadian company.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #72
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yellow dog View Post
    Wow a bunch of raw dog foods on the top of the list.
    The list is done by date....not a Top 10...

    With Raw food, there is always a heightened potential to be contaminated with Listeria and Salmonella.

  4. #73
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    And the Diamond recall summary includes 14 different brands -- many highly regarded
    C.A. in TO
    FIDE CANEM ~ Trust the Dog

  5. #74
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    The list is done by date....not a Top 10...

    With Raw food, there is always a heightened potential to be contaminated with Listeria and Salmonella.
    Agreed on the raw risk.
    The list has a link to sort by brand. More enlightening.
    C.A. in TO
    FIDE CANEM ~ Trust the Dog

  6. #75
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C.A. in TO View Post
    And the Diamond recall summary includes 14 different brands -- many highly regarded
    Yes but that was a few years ago and they paid out for that .

  7. #76
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yellow dog View Post
    Sure seemed like it when you write chicken carcases and my meat in the same sentence. You didn't identify what was in your meat that you are paying a $1.50 a day. I use to buy the frozen 50lb blocks of musher mix for $20.00. It contained beef,chicken,tripe, trout, liver and if the market changed horse meat. Every three months a bunch of us would put our order in and meet in Walefield Quebec for pick up. To this day a reliable source still makes the delivery to the people who are feeding raw. Now that's cheap.

    You probably missed post #35

    I feed my dog raw and he is as healthy as a horse.There is no big learning curve.Raw chicken carcass in the morning and a big chunk of raw meat in the evening.Whats in the raw meat,dont really know,muscle,liver,heart,bit of lung.Throw in a raw egg once a week,cut grate some raw carrots,cut up some raw kale,a little fish oil.Its not rocket science

  8. #77
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    [QUOTE=trimmer21;879438]My close friend and professor at OVC told me that the best pet food was leftover people food mixed with good quailty kibble for roughage and fiber.

    Raw is digested in 6 hours and kibble in 12 hours,that is why its not real good to mix.Some kibble is never fully digested and that is why dogs take a second crack at it in the form of stoles.

  9. #78
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    [QUOTE=Gilroy;880114]
    Quote Originally Posted by [COLOR=#333333
    Gilroy;879438]
    Raw is digested in 6 hours and kibble in 12 hours,that is why its not real good to mix.Some kibble is never fully digested and that is why dogs take a second crack at it in the form of stoles.
    According to my nutritionist friend, it's not a problem to feed both. I've read the debates from both sides however. Some say no and others say it doesn't matter. I feed both to my pooch and no problems. They digest everything just fine, or at least my dog does.
    Rick

  10. #79
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yellow dog View Post
    Sure seemed like it when you write chicken carcases and my meat in the same sentence. You didn't identify what was in your meat that you are paying a $1.50 a day. I use to buy the frozen 50lb blocks of musher mix for $20.00. It contained beef,chicken,tripe, trout, liver and if the market changed horse meat. Every three months a bunch of us would put our order in and meet in Walefield Quebec for pick up. To this day a reliable source still makes the delivery to the people who are feeding raw. Now that's cheap.
    Did you factor into the math the time and gas for the drive to Quebec.

  11. #80
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Saugus man alleges Beneful pet food killed his dog

    A Massachusetts man has filed suit against pet food maker Nestle Purina alleging that its Beneful food kills dogs.
    It’s the second potential class-action lawsuit filed against the company in less than a month. Rumors about the dog food line have swirled around the Internet since at least 2007, according to the website Snopes.com, and Nestle Purina has consistently asserted that its product is safe.
    The lawsuit, filed Feb. 27 in federal court in Boston, said that Saugus resident Paul Malcolm suffered “severe physical and emotional distress” after his Rotweiler-bulldog mix Ben died on February 26 after collapsing several times during the night of February 25 and the next morning. Although Malcolm rushed his 135-pound dog to Saugus Animal Hospital, the complaint says, the dog died en route.
    Ben had been fed a diet of Beneful Healthy Weight for three to four years, which the complaint asserts had a “direct and proximate” role in the dog’s death. To support their claims, the attorneys offered 11 testimonials from pet owners culled from the Internet, as well as studies they claim prove the food to be toxic.
    Malcolm’s attorneys said in a filing they were seeking over $5 million in damages for the entire class. Although they didn’t know how many people were affected, dog food maker Nestle Purina has said 1.5 billion Beneful meals were served to dogs in 2014.
    Nestle Purina didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment left Monday morning. In past statements, the company has said its own tests have shown the food to be safe, including batches tied to claims of pet deaths. In a statement made to Snopes in February, the company called the California suit “baseless” and said two similar lawsuits had been dismissed.
    “Bottom line: Consumers can continue to feed Beneful with total confidence,” the company told Snopes.
    Earlier in February, a California man named Frank Lucido filed a class-action suit against Purina with similar allegations about the dog food after three of his dogs fell ill and one later died. Nestle Purina Petcare Co., a subsidiary of the Swiss conglomerate Nestle, is based in St. Louis, Mo.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/business...kBN/story.html


    Rick

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •