-
March 15th, 2015, 10:01 AM
#51

Originally Posted by
brent
Or when you say rule, do you mean firearms safety rule?
Brings up a good observation....MOST hunting deaths/accidents that I can remember off hand were the direct result of a violation of one the Firearm Safety rules. Probably something that should be stressed more than just the Regs that only cost you money.
-
March 15th, 2015 10:01 AM
# ADS
-
March 15th, 2015, 10:04 AM
#52
Has too much time on their hands
Agreed.....charges pertaining to safety are usually laid as a result of an incident.
-
March 15th, 2015, 10:40 AM
#53
[QUOTE=double lung;883432]hunting with unlicenced dog, don't know anyone who buys a licence for their dog, don't know the point in having to licence the dog, pure cash grab. Told the dog it needed a licence, hope she doesn't get charged cause she has no money to pay the fine.[/QUOTE
If you listen really closely that little whine was " you ll do the time for me won t you"
-
March 15th, 2015, 10:54 AM
#54

Originally Posted by
MikePal
Brings up a good observation....MOST hunting deaths/accidents that I can remember off hand were the direct result of a violation of one the Firearm Safety rules. Probably something that should be stressed more than just the Regs that only cost you money.
MikePal
the reason it s written down as a rule is common sense ain t so common. who ever got killed by a loaded gun ?
-
March 15th, 2015, 11:21 AM
#55
Lets hope the MNR isnt tracking this thread lol
-
March 15th, 2015, 11:32 AM
#56

Originally Posted by
jaycee
Is that any different than what most police do, they lay charges and then let you fight it out in the courts, often times they are wrong but it is up to you and your lawyers to "prove them wrong" and this can bet an expensive situation.
Think you got it a bit wrong. They lay charges if warranted and its up to you too either man up an admit your guilt or pay a good lawyer to weasel out of the charge.
-
March 15th, 2015, 12:42 PM
#57

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
Think you got it a bit wrong. They lay charges if warranted and its up to you too either man up an admit your guilt or pay a good lawyer to weasel out of the charge.
Lol. That's a funny.
Sometimes yes, the OPP have it right.
Sometimes they don't.
How is it one careless cigarette can cause a forest fire, but it takes a whole box of matches to light a campfire?
-
March 15th, 2015, 01:20 PM
#58

Originally Posted by
chameleon
Besides it is not good to keep your meat any longer freezer burn and spoilage would be an issue.
I vacuum seal most of my meat now and it keeps for a long time. I found some beef tenderloin that was 3 years old and it was fine. No freezer burn or bad taste. So spoilage is not an issue.
Cheers
-
March 15th, 2015, 01:28 PM
#59
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
smitty55
I vacuum seal most of my meat now and it keeps for a long time. I found some beef tenderloin that was 3 years old and it was fine. No freezer burn or bad taste. So spoilage is not an issue.
Cheers
Professionally wrapped in butcher paper lasts a long time too. I don't worry about spoilage in my freezer.
-
March 15th, 2015, 02:17 PM
#60

Originally Posted by
brent
I would guess the biggest hunting one would be sunrise/sunset times and being encased.
Party hunting for waterfowl.
"Party" fishing.
There was a debate a couple of years ago on a bird hunting forum I used to be on regarding party hunting for waterfowl. I ended up getting a hold of the CWS and asked and they replied that yes, it's perfectly legal. I printed a copy of the email and used to carry it with me when duck and goose hunting in case there was ever an issue in the field.