Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: Possibly the most ignorant editorial on firearms in Canada, ever

  1. #31
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DGearyFTE View Post
    Well the stupidity didn't end with the first article. If the first installment didn't raise your blood pressure then Margo Goodhand's response to the readership will really put you over the top...

    http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Journ...582/story.html
    Actually,I'm surprised that Ms. Goodhand and the editors presented the dissenting side of the article in the manner that she did. We'll never see that in The Star or Globe and Mail.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    Actually,I'm surprised that Ms. Goodhand and the editors presented the dissenting side of the article in the manner that she did. We'll never see that in The Star or Globe and Mail.
    Even the presentation of the discenting side didn't mask the condescension!
    There is room for all God's creatures - right next to the mashed potatoes!

  4. #33
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I think it's just to bring more readers to their site, publicity....

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •